Moving workloads to multiple clouds shifts the security question from where the perimeter sits to whether controls travel with the data itself, so these picks emphasize data-centric enforcement across environments. The top tools from the Cloud Edge Security category that stood out to me include Prisma Access, Forcepoint Data Security Cloud, Cato SASE Cloud, and Netskope One Platform.
As your data lands in more clouds, is your bigger gap visibility into where it goes or enforcement once it moves? And has anyone paired a data-security layer with a separate access layer here?
##### Post Metadata - Posted at: 2 months ago - Author title: Marketer - Net upvotes: 1 ## Comments ### Comment 1 <p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">For the actual question being asked here, Netskope's DLP following the data itself as it moves between clouds, rather than just watching the connection, is what I'd want most. Blocking an upload to an unsanctioned service is a more direct answer to where the data goes than a consistent policy at the network layer.</span></p> ##### Comment Metadata - Posted at: 8 days ago - Author title: Marketing ### Comment 2 <p>On visibility versus enforcement, I'd argue visibility has to come first, and not merely as a sequencing preference. Enforcement is only ever as good as your classification, and a classifier that's wrong in either direction gives you one of two outcomes: sensitive data moving because nothing flagged it, or people unable to do their jobs because everything is flagged, and the second gets the policy switched off within a fortnight. So the real project underneath all of this is classification accuracy, which is what makes the Forcepoint reviewers noting that policy tuning takes time the most honest line in the post. You're buying the tooling to do the classification work, and enforcement is what you turn on once that's trustworthy.</p> ##### Comment Metadata - Posted at: 10 days ago - Author title: Tech Consultant ### Comment 3 <p>Enforcement once the data moves would be the bigger gap for me. Visibility tells you what happened, but the real value is having DLP and access policies stay consistent across SaaS, IaaS, endpoints, and multiple cloud providers without rebuilding them in each environment.</p> ##### Comment Metadata - Posted at: 12 days ago - Author title: Marketer ### Comment 4 Looking at these four, I think there's a split worth calling out: Prisma Access and Cato keep policy and inspection consistent as workloads move, but that's really about the connection staying uniform, not the data itself being tracked. Forcepoint and Netskope are the two that actually watch the file or data object as it moves between clouds, which is closer to what the question is asking for. Cato admits as much itself, since reviewers note it still lacks full DLP. That makes me think most teams end up stacking a connection-consistency layer with a real DLP layer rather than getting both from one platform, which brings back some of the tool sprawl the multi-cloud move was supposed to reduce in the first place. ##### Comment Metadata - Posted at: 2 months ago - Author title: SEO Content Writer ## Related discussions - [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team) - Posted at: over 13 years ago - Comments: 6 - [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section) - Posted at: over 13 years ago - Comments: 0 - [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm) - Posted at: over 13 years ago - Comments: 4