# What are the most trusted app localization providers by global UX research leads at software companies based on user reviews?

 I'm researching the most trusted app localization providers by global UX research leads at software companies based on user reviews, and I want input from practitioners in this space. For UX research teams, natural-sounding output matters as much as accuracy; if the localization sounds off, your research results will be off too. Here's what reviewers in the App Localization category describe across providers that have shown up in this context:   Alconost: Alconost linguists ask about character limits, synonyms, and usage before delivering, and a dedicated manager stays in contact throughout via Slack. Crowdin integration keeps the workflow connected for teams already using it.  LILT: LILT is built for continuous localization at scale, with translation memory and terminology management that keep UI language consistent across product updates and research materials.  Translated: Translated builds custom LQA frameworks for enterprise clients and is known for being proactive and consultative. Their team handles 13+ locales simultaneously and adjusts quickly when feedback comes in.  Andovar: Andovar provides a single point of contact per project and builds a termbase for product-specific terminology consistency, with a structured, milestone-driven approach to project management.  Pangea Localization Services: Pangea's process includes clarifying questions before work starts and native speaker verification at delivery. Both steps are built into how they handle projects, which tends to reduce revision cycles.  Renaissance Translations: Renaissance lets clients communicate directly with translators and monitor real-time status through their platform, which fits iterative UX research workflows where feedback needs to move quickly.   For UX research leads or localization managers at software companies: which provider gave you the most confidence that the localized output would behave the same way in user testing as the original? And how much of that confidence came from the vendor's process versus your own quality review? 

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 2 months ago
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

<p>Curious how much of this actually comes down to the vendor vs. your internal review process. Like, even with a great provider, are UX research leads doing their own native speaker checks before running studies, or are you mostly trusting the vendor's QA? Asking because I feel like the answer changes a lot depending on how many locales you're managing at once.</p>

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 2 months ago
- Author title: SEO Content Specialist





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4