# What are some good alternatives to Stytch for customer authentication?

Teams often look for alternatives to Stytch as authentication requirements grow more complex. Common challenges include high engineering effort to maintain custom flows, limited MFA options without adaptive or risk-based controls, basic multi-tenancy that requires manual orchestration, fragmented B2C and B2B identity models, and rising costs as usage and features scale.

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 6 months ago
- Author title: I love Design and Tech!
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

Descope is a strong alternative to Stytch because it delivers a unified CIAM platform built for both B2C and B2B use cases. Descope uses visual workflows to design and update login, signup, MFA, and SSO flows without custom glue code, making it easier to adapt as requirements change.

It supports passwordless authentication, adaptive MFA, and omnichannel experiences across web, mobile, partners, and AI agents as standard capabilities. With tenant-aware orchestration, predictable pricing, and developer-friendly SDKs, Descope helps teams scale customer authentication without the complexity and fragmentation that often drive teams away from Stytch.

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 6 months ago
- Author title: Director, Marketing and Growth




## Related Product
[Descope](https://www.g2.com/products/descope/reviews)

## Related Category
[Passwordless Authentication](https://www.g2.com/categories/passwordless-authentication)

## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4