# What application release orchestration tools have the best GitHub and GitLab integration out of the box so a DevOps team does not need custom connectors just to connect to its own repos?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Question for the<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/application-release-orchestration"> </a><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/application-release-orchestration">application release orchestration</a> reviewers and researchers here. What I want to know is while every vendor in this space promises "seamless Git integration,” which tools actually connect to GitHub and GitLab out of the box, so a DevOps team is not building custom connectors just to reach its own repos?</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">The bar we're setting is simple:</p><ul>
<li>Connect with a login or token, not a plugin you have to maintain</li>
<li>Pick up branches, pull requests, and triggers without extra wiring</li>
<li>Treat GitHub and GitLab as equals, not one first-class and one an afterthought</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">A few we've been researching on G2:</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/codefresh/reviews"><strong>Codefresh</strong></a>: closest to that bar. GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket are all built in, and triggers and webhooks work the same across them.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/azure-pipelines/reviews"><strong>Azure Pipelines</strong></a>: excellent with GitHub, since Microsoft owns both. GitLab is the catch. It connects as a generic Git repo and loses conveniences along the way.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/octopus-deploy/reviews"><strong>Octopus Deploy</strong></a>: handles the release side well and can keep its config in your GitHub or GitLab repo, but it expects your CI tool to hand off builds.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">And yes, if every repo lives in one place,<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/github/reviews"> </a><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/github/reviews"><strong>GitHub</strong></a> or<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/gitlab/reviews"> </a><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/gitlab/reviews"><strong>GitLab</strong></a> running its own pipelines is the zero-setup answer, at the cost of tying orchestration to that platform.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">So here's my real question: where does "native integration" quietly turn into "install this and maintain it yourself"? Which tool would get dropped from your shortlist and what for?</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 3 months ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

Codefresh treating GitHub and GitLab as genuinely equal, not one native and one bolted on, is rarer than it should be in this category. Webhooks and triggers working the same across both saved us from maintaining two separate configs.

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 1 day ago
- Author title: SEO Content Specialist



### Comment 2

&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: rgb(0, 0, 0);&quot;&gt;CloudBees is a strong, heavily reviewed option here for comprehensive integration coverage and deployment reliability across both cloud and on-prem environments.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 10 days ago



### Comment 3

&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: rgb(0, 0, 0);&quot;&gt;GitLab and GitHub both offer native repo integration out of the box, since GitLab itself functions as an application release orchestration platform with GitHub connectivity built in, no custom connectors needed for your own repos.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 10 days ago



### Comment 4

&lt;p&gt;I’d test this with repository churn rather than the initial connection. Add a new repo, rename a branch, change permissions, rotate a token, and move a project between groups, then see which integrations recover through normal configuration instead of custom work. “Native” feels meaningful only if the integration remains low-maintenance after the repo structure changes. Otherwise, the connector may simply move the maintenance burden from installation to ongoing administration.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 11 days ago
- Author title: Writer



### Comment 5

&lt;p&gt;From G2 reviews, Azure Pipelines gets dropped first for mixed-repo teams — reviewers confirm GitLab works but loses PR triggers and status feedback that GitHub gets natively, which quietly becomes a maintenance burden the &quot;native integration&quot; pitch doesn&#39;t mention. Codefresh holds up best across both platforms in practice, with reviewers specifically noting that webhooks and branch triggers work consistently without per-repo configuration, which is where most tools&#39; &quot;seamless&quot; claims quietly fall apart.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 2 months ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4