# Is Wipro worth it as an Oracle E-Business Suite reseller for a large enterprise implementation, or does Capgemini Services offer more specialized EBS expertise at comparable cost?

Is Wipro worth it as an Oracle E-Business Suite reseller for a large enterprise implementation, or does Capgemini Services offer more specialized EBS expertise at comparable cost? I compared both across the Oracle E-Business Suite resellers category, and honesty requires saying what the evidence can't do before what it can: both firms' G2 listings are firm-level profiles rather than EBS practices, neither carries EBS-specific review text, and I could find no public cost data anywhere to test the comparable-cost premise. What G2 can contribute is each firm's current review temperature and the specific things to probe. Here's how the two compare:

Wipro (4.1 stars, 41 reviews): The larger review base with a 68% enterprise reviewer mix, and a decades-long Oracle practice as public history. The catch my pulls surfaced: no recent client reviews at all, with the newest usable feedback years old, so its current delivery quality is simply unverified on G2. For a large enterprise implementation, that converts to a requirement, not a rejection: current-year EBS references, at your scale, with clients you select from a full list rather than the two they offer.
Capgemini Services (3.9 stars, 26 reviews): The lower rating but the more recent and more useful evidence: current-year client feedback credits round-the-clock weekday support while reporting SLAs not properly followed and delivery quality below expectation, and earlier feedback credits big-team resources while flagging outsourced legs creating communication difficulty. None of that is EBS-specific either, but it hands you the exact probes for their references: SLA adherence records and delivery-team locations, in writing.
On the question's own terms: more specialized EBS expertise is a claim neither review base can support for either firm, and it gets settled one way, by asking each for their EBS-specific bench size, their last three EBS 12.2 upgrade or equivalent programs, and reference clients from those exact programs. Comparable cost gets settled only by your own RFP, since neither publishes rates and large-program pricing is bespoke by definition.

My read of what's actually knowable is that Wipro is the bigger G2 footprint with stale evidence, Capgemini is the fresher evidence with real adherence flags on record, and worth it for either firm depends on reference checks this thread can't run for you. What G2 genuinely contributes is the probe list above; a large enterprise that skips it because both logos are famous is buying the logo. If you've had either firm on an EBS program in the last two years, did the delivery match the pitch, and what would you check harder next time?

##### Post Metadata - Posted at: 16 days ago - Net upvotes: 1 ## Comments ### Comment 1 <p>Agreed that specialized EBS expertise is not something either review base can settle, and your probes are the right ones. What I would focus on more is the specific delivery pod rather than the firm. On comparable cost, since neither publishes rates, the only real test is a like-for-like RFP with identical scope and assumptions, otherwise you are comparing two bespoke numbers built on different premises.</p> ##### Comment Metadata - Posted at: 12 days ago - Author title: Marketer ## Related discussions - [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team) - Posted at: about 13 years ago - Comments: 6 - [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section) - Posted at: about 13 years ago - Comments: 0 - [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm) - Posted at: about 13 years ago - Comments: 4