# IBM Consulting vs Capgemini vs HP Enterprise Consulting for enterprise mobility: which mobility consulting firm provides the best risk assessment and vendor selection support for regulated industries?

 IBM Consulting vs Capgemini vs HP Enterprise Consulting for enterprise mobility: which mobility consulting firm provides the best risk assessment and vendor selection support for regulated industries? I've been looking at this question through the lens of enterprise reviews in the mobility consulting category on G2, and the three firms named in this comparison are quite different in how they're described by practitioners who've worked with them.  Here's a quick read on each, with a fourth option that's worth including in the conversation:   IBM Consulting - Structured engagement model with depth across regulated sectors including financial services, telecoms, and energy; a natural starting point for risk-sensitive mobility programmes.  Capgemini Services - Large-scale consulting practice with depth across SAP, security, and enterprise application development, well-suited to multi-workstream programmes where breadth across the technology stack matters.  HP Enterprise Consulting - Strong IT infrastructure and cybersecurity capabilities, with consulting that covers enterprise architecture, cloud transformation, and IT strategy; practical when mobility work is tied to broader infrastructure decisions.  RSM Consulting - Focused compliance and cybersecurity practice with documented Intune and Azure deployments; a time-and-material model gives regulated-sector clients flexibility without long-term commitment risk.   Which of these has your organisation worked with for a regulated industry mobility programme? Would be interested in hearing from anyone who ran a formal vendor selection process and what criteria ended up carrying the most weight. 

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 2 months ago
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

<p>These three are pretty different in practice. Capgemini makes more sense when the mobility work is one piece of a bigger multi-workstream programme. IBM fits better when the compliance requirements are genuinely complex and you need sector depth. HP's infrastructure background gives it credibility when mobility is tied to broader IT decisions. They're not really competing for the same use case, despite getting compared a lot.</p>

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 2 months ago
- Author title: SEO Content Specialist





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4