# How do you handle complex automation scenarios in testRigor vs Selenium or Playwright?

testRigor’s no-code approach makes it easy to build and debug tests without infrastructure setup, and it can replace lots of Selenium or Playwright code with simple steps. Cross-browser and cross-platform coverage, plus the dataset concept, helps reduce maintenance and keep focus on product quality and test coverage. The tradeoff is that very complex or heavily customized scenarios can feel less flexible, and teams used to code-based frameworks may need time to adjust. If you’ve used testRigor, where has it worked best for you, and where did you hit limits?

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: about 2 months ago
- Author title: Software Engineer @PeerIslands | Software Enthusiast | Exploring Development & QA 
- Net upvotes: 1



## Related Product
[testRigor](https://www.g2.com/products/testrigor/reviews)

## Related Category
[AI Software Testing Tools](https://www.g2.com/categories/ai-software-testing-tools)

## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4