# How can we improve action item accuracy in AI summaries?

I find RingEX's AI summaries to be quite useful for saving time, but I believe they still require human verification. In technical discussions, the risk of missing an action item or mistakenly assigning a task to the wrong person can lead to confusion. I would appreciate improvements in context recognition and a more accurate identification of speakers and their responsibilities in future updates.

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 3 days ago
- Author title: Software Engineer at Ingram Micro
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

You should check what ai written

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 1 day ago
- Author title: DevOps Engineer At Tech Mahindra




## Related Product
[RingEX](https://www.g2.com/products/ringex/reviews)

## Related Category
[VoIP Providers](https://www.g2.com/categories/voip-providers)

## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4