# HeyDeer AI for PR reviews: reliable bug catching, but I still have to switch into GitHub

We use HeyDeer AI to review pull requests because AI is writing more code than we can realistically read ourselves, and it has saved us a lot of time. We tried GitHub Copilot first, but it kept missing bugs; HeyDeer’s multi-model approach has felt more reliable and has helped us catch issues we would have missed, improving robustness and security. The downside is we still have to open GitHub to read the findings instead of seeing them in the terminal or other tools we already use. How are others handling this context switching when using AI for PR reviews?

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 1 day ago
- Author title: AI Engineer
- Net upvotes: 1



## Related Product
[HeyDeer AI](https://www.g2.com/products/heydeer-ai/reviews)

## Related Category
[Peer Code Review](https://www.g2.com/categories/peer-code-review)

## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4