# why STAAD.PRO gives uneconomical Design For High Rise RCC buildings?

STAAD Pro gives satisfactory results only for steel structures but in case of concrete structures the results are uneconomical, the reinforcement provided are on higher side. is there any reason for it?

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: over 5 years ago
- Author title: Structural Engineer at Shapoorji Pallonji And Company Private Limited



## Comments
### Comment 1

There are many possibilities for that, but it depends on the design code, the user input, etc. You should probably post your request on the Bentley STAAD Forum https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum and include your file. Also indicate your version. 

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: over 5 years ago
- Author title: Director of User Success Bentley Systems




## Related Product
[STAAD.Pro](https://www.g2.com/products/staad-pro/reviews)

## Related Category
[Building Design and Building Information Modeling (BIM)](https://www.g2.com/categories/building-design-and-building-information-modeling-bim)

## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4