# Top 10 IBM Engineering Test Management Alternatives & Competitors
**Average Rating:** 4.1/5
**Total Number of Reviews:** 25
Forschen Sie nach alternativen Lösungen zu IBM Engineering Test Management auf G2, mit echten Nutzerbewertungen zu konkurrierenden Tools. Andere wichtige Faktoren, die bei der Recherche von Alternativen zu IBM Engineering Test Management zu berücksichtigen sind, beinhalten features und projects. Die beste Gesamtalternative zu IBM Engineering Test Management ist TestRail. Andere ähnliche Apps wie IBM Engineering Test Management sind OpenText Application Quality Management, Tuskr, BrowserStack, und UiPath Agentic Automation. IBM Engineering Test Management Alternativen finden Sie in [Software-Testwerkzeuge](https://www.g2.com/de/categories/software-testing), aber sie könnten auch in [Testmanagement-Tools](https://www.g2.com/de/categories/test-management) oder [Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Software - Roboterprozessautomatisierungssoftware](https://www.g2.com/de/categories/robotic-process-automation-rpa) sein.


## Beste kostenpflichtige & kostenlose Alternativen zu IBM Engineering Test Management
  - [TestRail](https://www.g2.com/de/products/testrail/reviews)
  - [OpenText Application Quality Management](https://www.g2.com/de/products/opentext-application-quality-management/reviews)
  - [Tuskr](https://www.g2.com/de/products/tuskr/reviews)
  - [BrowserStack](https://www.g2.com/de/products/browserstack/reviews)
  - [UiPath Agentic Automation](https://www.g2.com/de/products/uipath-agentic-automation/reviews)
  - [Panaya Smart Testing and Change Intelligence](https://www.g2.com/de/products/panaya-smart-testing-and-change-intelligence/reviews)
  - [Postman](https://www.g2.com/de/products/postman/reviews)
  - [Salesforce Headless 360 Platform (formerly Salesforce Platform)](https://www.g2.com/de/products/agentforce-360-platform-formerly-salesforce-platform/reviews)
  - [Hotjar by Contentsquare](https://www.g2.com/de/products/hotjar-by-contentsquare/reviews)
  - [Qase](https://www.g2.com/de/products/qase/reviews)

## Top 10 Alternativen zu IBM Engineering Test Management kürzlich von der G2-Community überprüft
Untenstehende Optionen durchsuchen. Basierend auf Bewertungsdaten können Sie sehen, wie IBM Engineering Test Management im Vergleich zur Konkurrenz abschneidet, Bewertungen von aktuellen und früheren Benutzern in Branchen wie Informationstechnologie und Dienstleistungen, Computer- und Netzwerksicherheit, und Transportwesen/LKW-Transport/Eisenbahn überprüfen und das beste Produkt für Ihr Unternehmen finden.


  ### 1. [TestRail](https://www.g2.com/de/products/testrail/reviews)
By Sembi
**Average Rating:** 4.4/5
**Total Reviews:** 611
TestRail hilft Ihnen, Ihre Softwaretestbemühungen zu verwalten und zu verfolgen und Ihre QA-Abteilung zu organisieren. Die intuitive webbasierte Benutzeroberfläche erleichtert das Erstellen von Testfällen, das Verwalten von Testruns und die Koordination Ihres gesamten Testprozesses.


Reviewers say compared to IBM Engineering Test Management, TestRail is:
- Brauchbarer
- Besser bei der unterstützung
Categories in common with IBM Engineering Test Management: [Software-Testen](https://www.g2.com/de/categories/software-testing), [Testmanagement](https://www.g2.com/de/categories/test-management)

**Compare:** [IBM Engineering Test Management vs TestRail](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/ibm-engineering-test-management-vs-testrail)
**Compare TestRail with other alternatives:**
- [TestRail vs OpenText Application Quality Management](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/opentext-application-quality-management-vs-testrail)
- [TestRail vs Tuskr](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/testrail-vs-tuskr)
- [TestRail vs BrowserStack](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/browserstack-vs-testrail)
- [TestRail vs UiPath Agentic Automation](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/testrail-vs-uipath-agentic-automation)
- [TestRail vs Panaya Smart Testing and Change Intelligence](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/panaya-smart-testing-and-change-intelligence-vs-testrail)
- [TestRail vs Postman](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/postman-vs-testrail)
- [TestRail vs Salesforce Headless 360 Platform (formerly Salesforce Platform)](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/agentforce-360-platform-formerly-salesforce-platform-vs-testrail)
- [TestRail vs Hotjar by Contentsquare](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/hotjar-by-contentsquare-vs-testrail)
- [TestRail vs Qase](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/qase-vs-testrail)

  ### 2. [OpenText Application Quality Management](https://www.g2.com/de/products/opentext-application-quality-management/reviews)
By OpenText
**Average Rating:** 4.0/5
**Total Reviews:** 133
Micro Focus ALM Quality Center ist eine Reihe von Softwareprodukten, die für die Beschleunigung der Bereitstellung sicherer, zuverlässiger moderner Anwendungen entwickelt wurden.


Reviewers say compared to IBM Engineering Test Management, OpenText Application Quality Management is:
- Brauchbarer
- Besser bei der unterstützung
Categories in common with IBM Engineering Test Management: [Software-Testen](https://www.g2.com/de/categories/software-testing), [Automatisiertes Testen](https://www.g2.com/de/categories/automation-testing-tools), [Testmanagement](https://www.g2.com/de/categories/test-management)

**Compare:** [IBM Engineering Test Management vs OpenText Application Quality Management](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/ibm-engineering-test-management-vs-opentext-application-quality-management)
**Compare OpenText Application Quality Management with other alternatives:**
- [OpenText Application Quality Management vs TestRail](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/opentext-application-quality-management-vs-testrail)
- [OpenText Application Quality Management vs Tuskr](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/opentext-application-quality-management-vs-tuskr)
- [OpenText Application Quality Management vs BrowserStack](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/browserstack-vs-opentext-application-quality-management)
- [OpenText Application Quality Management vs UiPath Agentic Automation](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/opentext-application-quality-management-vs-uipath-agentic-automation)
- [OpenText Application Quality Management vs Panaya Smart Testing and Change Intelligence](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/opentext-application-quality-management-vs-panaya-smart-testing-and-change-intelligence)
- [OpenText Application Quality Management vs Postman](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/opentext-application-quality-management-vs-postman)
- [OpenText Application Quality Management vs Salesforce Headless 360 Platform (formerly Salesforce Platform)](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/opentext-application-quality-management-vs-agentforce-360-platform-formerly-salesforce-platform)
- [OpenText Application Quality Management vs Hotjar by Contentsquare](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/hotjar-by-contentsquare-vs-opentext-application-quality-management)
- [OpenText Application Quality Management vs Qase](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/opentext-application-quality-management-vs-qase)

  ### 3. [Tuskr](https://www.g2.com/de/products/tuskr/reviews)
By Tuskr
**Average Rating:** 4.6/5
**Total Reviews:** 650
Tuskr ist eine cloudbasierte Testmanagement-Software. Sie können Testfälle verwalten, Testläufe durchführen und mit Ihren Fehler- und Zeitverfolgungstools integrieren. Tuskr ist leistungsstark, dennoch ästhetisch ansprechend und intuitiv. Mit seinem unschlagbaren Preis, einem großzügigen kostenlosen Plan und einer 30-tägigen kostenlosen Testversion sollte Tuskr ganz oben auf der Evaluierungsliste stehen.


Reviewers say compared to IBM Engineering Test Management, Tuskr is:
- Brauchbarer
- Besser bei der unterstützung
- Einfacher einzurichten
Categories in common with IBM Engineering Test Management: [Software-Testen](https://www.g2.com/de/categories/software-testing), [Testmanagement](https://www.g2.com/de/categories/test-management)

**Compare:** [IBM Engineering Test Management vs Tuskr](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/ibm-engineering-test-management-vs-tuskr)
**Compare Tuskr with other alternatives:**
- [Tuskr vs TestRail](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/testrail-vs-tuskr)
- [Tuskr vs OpenText Application Quality Management](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/opentext-application-quality-management-vs-tuskr)
- [Tuskr vs BrowserStack](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/browserstack-vs-tuskr)
- [Tuskr vs UiPath Agentic Automation](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/tuskr-vs-uipath-agentic-automation)
- [Tuskr vs Panaya Smart Testing and Change Intelligence](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/panaya-smart-testing-and-change-intelligence-vs-tuskr)
- [Tuskr vs Postman](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/postman-vs-tuskr)
- [Tuskr vs Salesforce Headless 360 Platform (formerly Salesforce Platform)](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/agentforce-360-platform-formerly-salesforce-platform-vs-tuskr)
- [Tuskr vs Hotjar by Contentsquare](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/hotjar-by-contentsquare-vs-tuskr)
- [Tuskr vs Qase](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/qase-vs-tuskr)

  ### 4. [BrowserStack](https://www.g2.com/de/products/browserstack/reviews)
By BrowserStack
**Average Rating:** 4.4/5
**Total Reviews:** 3,358
BrowserStack ist die weltweit führende cloudbasierte Testplattform, der über 50.000 Entwickler- und QA-Teams vertrauen, um schnelle, zuverlässige und qualitativ hochwertige Software bereitzustellen. Von manuellen über automatisierte, visuelle bis hin zu Barrierefreiheitstests bringt BrowserStack jede Ebene des QA-Prozesses auf eine einzige, integrierte Plattform, damit Sie mit Zuversicht in großem Maßstab liefern können. Unsere Produkte: Manuelles Testen Live: Cross-Browser-Testing App Live: Testen auf echten Geräten Testing Toolkit: Wesentliche manuelle Testwerkzeuge Testautomatisierung Automate: Browser-Automatisierungs-Cloud App Automate: Mobile App-Automatisierungs-Cloud Percy: Visuelles Testen & Überprüfung App Percy: Visuelles Testen & Überprüfung Management & Optimierung Testmanagement: Planen, verfolgen und verwalten von Tests Testmanagement für Jira: Tests innerhalb von Jira verwalten Testberichterstattung & Analytik: Alle Tests überwachen & optimieren Automatisierung ohne Codierung Low Code Automation: KI-gesteuerte automatisierte Tests Website Scanner: All-in-One Website-Checker


Reviewers say compared to IBM Engineering Test Management, BrowserStack is:
- Brauchbarer
- Besser bei der unterstützung
Categories in common with IBM Engineering Test Management: [Software-Testen](https://www.g2.com/de/categories/software-testing), [Automatisiertes Testen](https://www.g2.com/de/categories/automation-testing-tools), [Testmanagement](https://www.g2.com/de/categories/test-management)

**Compare:** [IBM Engineering Test Management vs BrowserStack](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/browserstack-vs-ibm-engineering-test-management)
**Compare BrowserStack with other alternatives:**
- [BrowserStack vs TestRail](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/browserstack-vs-testrail)
- [BrowserStack vs OpenText Application Quality Management](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/browserstack-vs-opentext-application-quality-management)
- [BrowserStack vs Tuskr](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/browserstack-vs-tuskr)
- [BrowserStack vs UiPath Agentic Automation](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/browserstack-vs-uipath-agentic-automation)
- [BrowserStack vs Panaya Smart Testing and Change Intelligence](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/browserstack-vs-panaya-smart-testing-and-change-intelligence)
- [BrowserStack vs Postman](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/browserstack-vs-postman)
- [BrowserStack vs Salesforce Headless 360 Platform (formerly Salesforce Platform)](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/browserstack-vs-agentforce-360-platform-formerly-salesforce-platform)
- [BrowserStack vs Hotjar by Contentsquare](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/browserstack-vs-hotjar-by-contentsquare)
- [BrowserStack vs Qase](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/browserstack-vs-qase)

  ### 5. [UiPath Agentic Automation](https://www.g2.com/de/products/uipath-agentic-automation/reviews)
By UiPath
**Average Rating:** 4.6/5
**Total Reviews:** 7,581
UiPath ermöglicht es Geschäftsanwendern ohne Programmierkenntnisse, Robotic Process Automation zu entwerfen und auszuführen.


Reviewers say compared to IBM Engineering Test Management, UiPath Agentic Automation is:
- Brauchbarer
- Besser bei der unterstützung
- Besser bei der erfüllung von anforderungen
Categories in common with IBM Engineering Test Management: [Automatisiertes Testen](https://www.g2.com/de/categories/automation-testing-tools)

**Compare:** [IBM Engineering Test Management vs UiPath Agentic Automation](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/ibm-engineering-test-management-vs-uipath-agentic-automation)
**Compare UiPath Agentic Automation with other alternatives:**
- [UiPath Agentic Automation vs TestRail](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/testrail-vs-uipath-agentic-automation)
- [UiPath Agentic Automation vs OpenText Application Quality Management](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/opentext-application-quality-management-vs-uipath-agentic-automation)
- [UiPath Agentic Automation vs Tuskr](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/tuskr-vs-uipath-agentic-automation)
- [UiPath Agentic Automation vs BrowserStack](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/browserstack-vs-uipath-agentic-automation)
- [UiPath Agentic Automation vs Panaya Smart Testing and Change Intelligence](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/panaya-smart-testing-and-change-intelligence-vs-uipath-agentic-automation)
- [UiPath Agentic Automation vs Postman](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/postman-vs-uipath-agentic-automation)
- [UiPath Agentic Automation vs Salesforce Headless 360 Platform (formerly Salesforce Platform)](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/agentforce-360-platform-formerly-salesforce-platform-vs-uipath-agentic-automation)
- [UiPath Agentic Automation vs Hotjar by Contentsquare](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/hotjar-by-contentsquare-vs-uipath-agentic-automation)
- [UiPath Agentic Automation vs Qase](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/qase-vs-uipath-agentic-automation)

  ### 6. [Panaya Smart Testing and Change Intelligence](https://www.g2.com/de/products/panaya-smart-testing-and-change-intelligence/reviews)
By Panaya LTD
**Average Rating:** 4.5/5
**Total Reviews:** 541
Die Panaya Smart Testing Plattform, Panaya Test Dynamix, ist eine Plattform für all Ihre Testanforderungen. Es ist die einzige native Plattform auf dem Markt, die Testmanagement, codelose Testautomatisierung und Change Impact Analysis kombiniert, für nahtlose End-to-End-Testprozesse. Unsere intelligente, KI-verbesserte Testplattform für ERP- und Unternehmens-Cloud-Anwendungen kombiniert funktionsübergreifende Geschäftsprozess-Tests mit intelligenter Änderungsanalyse, was zu einer Reduzierung Ihrer Testzyklen um 85% führt und die digitale Transformation ohne Risiko beschleunigt. Sie werden in der Lage sein, Testprozesse zu beschleunigen, Ressourcen mit Testautomatisierung zu sparen und gleichzeitig Echtzeit-Transparenz und intelligente Einblicke zu gewinnen, um fundierte Entscheidungen zu treffen.


Reviewers say compared to IBM Engineering Test Management, Panaya Smart Testing and Change Intelligence is:
- Brauchbarer
- Besser bei der unterstützung
Categories in common with IBM Engineering Test Management: [Software-Testen](https://www.g2.com/de/categories/software-testing), [Automatisiertes Testen](https://www.g2.com/de/categories/automation-testing-tools), [Testmanagement](https://www.g2.com/de/categories/test-management)

**Compare:** [IBM Engineering Test Management vs Panaya Smart Testing and Change Intelligence](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/ibm-engineering-test-management-vs-panaya-smart-testing-and-change-intelligence)
**Compare Panaya Smart Testing and Change Intelligence with other alternatives:**
- [Panaya Smart Testing and Change Intelligence vs TestRail](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/panaya-smart-testing-and-change-intelligence-vs-testrail)
- [Panaya Smart Testing and Change Intelligence vs OpenText Application Quality Management](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/opentext-application-quality-management-vs-panaya-smart-testing-and-change-intelligence)
- [Panaya Smart Testing and Change Intelligence vs Tuskr](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/panaya-smart-testing-and-change-intelligence-vs-tuskr)
- [Panaya Smart Testing and Change Intelligence vs BrowserStack](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/browserstack-vs-panaya-smart-testing-and-change-intelligence)
- [Panaya Smart Testing and Change Intelligence vs UiPath Agentic Automation](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/panaya-smart-testing-and-change-intelligence-vs-uipath-agentic-automation)
- [Panaya Smart Testing and Change Intelligence vs Postman](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/panaya-smart-testing-and-change-intelligence-vs-postman)
- [Panaya Smart Testing and Change Intelligence vs Salesforce Headless 360 Platform (formerly Salesforce Platform)](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/panaya-smart-testing-and-change-intelligence-vs-agentforce-360-platform-formerly-salesforce-platform)
- [Panaya Smart Testing and Change Intelligence vs Hotjar by Contentsquare](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/hotjar-by-contentsquare-vs-panaya-smart-testing-and-change-intelligence)
- [Panaya Smart Testing and Change Intelligence vs Qase](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/panaya-smart-testing-and-change-intelligence-vs-qase)

  ### 7. [Postman](https://www.g2.com/de/products/postman/reviews)
By Postman
**Average Rating:** 4.6/5
**Total Reviews:** 1,800
Postman ermöglicht es Teams, in jeder Phase des API-Lebenszyklus effizient zusammenzuarbeiten, während Qualität, Leistung und Sicherheit priorisiert werden.


Reviewers say compared to IBM Engineering Test Management, Postman is:
- Brauchbarer
- Besser bei der unterstützung
- Einfacher einzurichten
Categories in common with IBM Engineering Test Management: [Software-Testen](https://www.g2.com/de/categories/software-testing)

**Compare:** [IBM Engineering Test Management vs Postman](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/ibm-engineering-test-management-vs-postman)
**Compare Postman with other alternatives:**
- [Postman vs TestRail](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/postman-vs-testrail)
- [Postman vs OpenText Application Quality Management](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/opentext-application-quality-management-vs-postman)
- [Postman vs Tuskr](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/postman-vs-tuskr)
- [Postman vs BrowserStack](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/browserstack-vs-postman)
- [Postman vs UiPath Agentic Automation](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/postman-vs-uipath-agentic-automation)
- [Postman vs Panaya Smart Testing and Change Intelligence](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/panaya-smart-testing-and-change-intelligence-vs-postman)
- [Postman vs Salesforce Headless 360 Platform (formerly Salesforce Platform)](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/postman-vs-agentforce-360-platform-formerly-salesforce-platform)
- [Postman vs Hotjar by Contentsquare](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/hotjar-by-contentsquare-vs-postman)
- [Postman vs Qase](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/postman-vs-qase)

  ### 8. [Salesforce Headless 360 Platform (formerly Salesforce Platform)](https://www.g2.com/de/products/agentforce-360-platform-formerly-salesforce-platform/reviews)
By Salesforce
**Average Rating:** 4.5/5
**Total Reviews:** 3,996
Platform as a Service (PaaS) beseitigt die Kosten und Komplexität der Bewertung, des Kaufs, der Konfiguration und Verwaltung aller Hardware und Software, die für maßgeschneiderte Anwendungen benötigt werden.


Reviewers say compared to IBM Engineering Test Management, Salesforce Headless 360 Platform (formerly Salesforce Platform) is:
- Brauchbarer
- Besser bei der unterstützung
Categories in common with IBM Engineering Test Management: [Software-Testen](https://www.g2.com/de/categories/software-testing)

**Compare:** [IBM Engineering Test Management vs Salesforce Headless 360 Platform (formerly Salesforce Platform)](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/ibm-engineering-test-management-vs-agentforce-360-platform-formerly-salesforce-platform)
**Compare Salesforce Headless 360 Platform (formerly Salesforce Platform) with other alternatives:**
- [Salesforce Headless 360 Platform (formerly Salesforce Platform) vs TestRail](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/agentforce-360-platform-formerly-salesforce-platform-vs-testrail)
- [Salesforce Headless 360 Platform (formerly Salesforce Platform) vs OpenText Application Quality Management](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/opentext-application-quality-management-vs-agentforce-360-platform-formerly-salesforce-platform)
- [Salesforce Headless 360 Platform (formerly Salesforce Platform) vs Tuskr](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/agentforce-360-platform-formerly-salesforce-platform-vs-tuskr)
- [Salesforce Headless 360 Platform (formerly Salesforce Platform) vs BrowserStack](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/browserstack-vs-agentforce-360-platform-formerly-salesforce-platform)
- [Salesforce Headless 360 Platform (formerly Salesforce Platform) vs UiPath Agentic Automation](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/agentforce-360-platform-formerly-salesforce-platform-vs-uipath-agentic-automation)
- [Salesforce Headless 360 Platform (formerly Salesforce Platform) vs Panaya Smart Testing and Change Intelligence](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/panaya-smart-testing-and-change-intelligence-vs-agentforce-360-platform-formerly-salesforce-platform)
- [Salesforce Headless 360 Platform (formerly Salesforce Platform) vs Postman](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/postman-vs-agentforce-360-platform-formerly-salesforce-platform)
- [Salesforce Headless 360 Platform (formerly Salesforce Platform) vs Hotjar by Contentsquare](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/hotjar-by-contentsquare-vs-agentforce-360-platform-formerly-salesforce-platform)
- [Salesforce Headless 360 Platform (formerly Salesforce Platform) vs Qase](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/qase-vs-agentforce-360-platform-formerly-salesforce-platform)

  ### 9. [Hotjar by Contentsquare](https://www.g2.com/de/products/hotjar-by-contentsquare/reviews)
By Contentsquare
**Average Rating:** 4.3/5
**Total Reviews:** 345
Alles-in-einem-Analyse und Feedback.


Reviewers say compared to IBM Engineering Test Management, Hotjar by Contentsquare is:
- Brauchbarer
- Besser bei der unterstützung
- Einfacher einzurichten
Categories in common with IBM Engineering Test Management: [Software-Testen](https://www.g2.com/de/categories/software-testing)

**Compare:** [IBM Engineering Test Management vs Hotjar by Contentsquare](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/hotjar-by-contentsquare-vs-ibm-engineering-test-management)
**Compare Hotjar by Contentsquare with other alternatives:**
- [Hotjar by Contentsquare vs TestRail](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/hotjar-by-contentsquare-vs-testrail)
- [Hotjar by Contentsquare vs OpenText Application Quality Management](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/hotjar-by-contentsquare-vs-opentext-application-quality-management)
- [Hotjar by Contentsquare vs Tuskr](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/hotjar-by-contentsquare-vs-tuskr)
- [Hotjar by Contentsquare vs BrowserStack](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/browserstack-vs-hotjar-by-contentsquare)
- [Hotjar by Contentsquare vs UiPath Agentic Automation](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/hotjar-by-contentsquare-vs-uipath-agentic-automation)
- [Hotjar by Contentsquare vs Panaya Smart Testing and Change Intelligence](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/hotjar-by-contentsquare-vs-panaya-smart-testing-and-change-intelligence)
- [Hotjar by Contentsquare vs Postman](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/hotjar-by-contentsquare-vs-postman)
- [Hotjar by Contentsquare vs Salesforce Headless 360 Platform (formerly Salesforce Platform)](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/hotjar-by-contentsquare-vs-agentforce-360-platform-formerly-salesforce-platform)
- [Hotjar by Contentsquare vs Qase](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/hotjar-by-contentsquare-vs-qase)

  ### 10. [Qase](https://www.g2.com/de/products/qase/reviews)
By Qase Inc
**Average Rating:** 4.7/5
**Total Reviews:** 309
Qase macht es einfach, Testfälle zu verwalten, Testpläne zu erstellen und Testläufe als Einzelperson oder im Team durchzuführen.


Reviewers say compared to IBM Engineering Test Management, Qase is:
- Besser bei der unterstützung
- Brauchbarer
- Einfacher einzurichten
Categories in common with IBM Engineering Test Management: [Software-Testen](https://www.g2.com/de/categories/software-testing), [Automatisiertes Testen](https://www.g2.com/de/categories/automation-testing-tools), [Testmanagement](https://www.g2.com/de/categories/test-management)

**Compare:** [IBM Engineering Test Management vs Qase](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/ibm-engineering-test-management-vs-qase)
**Compare Qase with other alternatives:**
- [Qase vs TestRail](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/qase-vs-testrail)
- [Qase vs OpenText Application Quality Management](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/opentext-application-quality-management-vs-qase)
- [Qase vs Tuskr](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/qase-vs-tuskr)
- [Qase vs BrowserStack](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/browserstack-vs-qase)
- [Qase vs UiPath Agentic Automation](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/qase-vs-uipath-agentic-automation)
- [Qase vs Panaya Smart Testing and Change Intelligence](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/panaya-smart-testing-and-change-intelligence-vs-qase)
- [Qase vs Postman](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/postman-vs-qase)
- [Qase vs Salesforce Headless 360 Platform (formerly Salesforce Platform)](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/qase-vs-agentforce-360-platform-formerly-salesforce-platform)
- [Qase vs Hotjar by Contentsquare](https://www.g2.com/de/compare/hotjar-by-contentsquare-vs-qase)


## Artikel erkunden
- [Welche Arbeitsanweisungsplattform eignet sich am besten für ein Fertigungsunternehmen, das Schulungen und Standardarbeiten an mehreren Standorten mit verschiedenen Teams durchführt?](https://www.g2.com/de/discussions/which-work-instructions-platform-works-best-for-a-manufacturing-company-running-training-and-standard-work-across-multiple-sites-with-different-teams)
- [Welche Verkaufsschulungswerkzeuge beinhalten Leistungsanalysen, damit Manager sehen können, welche Vertreter sich in bestimmten Fähigkeiten verbessern und welche nur durchklicken?](https://www.g2.com/de/discussions/which-sales-training-tools-include-performance-analytics-so-managers-can-see-which-reps-are-improving-on-specific-skills-and-which-ones-are-just-clicking-through)
- [Welche Cloud-Sicherheitsüberwachungstools erkennen am schnellsten Fehlkonfigurationen und Compliance-Probleme, ohne dass Ihr Team stundenlang manuell Alarme triagieren muss?](https://www.g2.com/de/discussions/what-cloud-security-monitoring-tools-are-the-quickest-to-spot-misconfiguration-and-compliance-issues-without-your-team-spending-hours-manually-triaging-alerts)
- [Was ist die beste Verkaufsengagement-Plattform für RevOps-Teams, die eine tiefe CRM-Integration, Sequenzanalysen und Aktivitätsberichte benötigen?](https://www.g2.com/de/discussions/what-s-the-best-sales-engagement-platform-for-revops-teams-that-need-deep-crm-integration-sequence-analytics-and-activity-reporting)
- [Gibt es eine Verkaufstrainingsplattform, die tatsächlich für ein Verkaufsteam von 10 bis 30 Personen funktioniert, das sich keine vollständige Unternehmenslernsuite leisten kann, aber mehr als YouTube benötigt?](https://www.g2.com/de/discussions/s-there-a-sales-training-platform-that-actually-works-for-a-10-to-30-person-sales-team-that-cannot-afford-a-full-enterprise-learning-suite-but-needs-more-than-youtube)
- [Welche Plattformen zur Veranstaltungsregistrierung nutzen Veranstaltungsteams tatsächlich auch nach dem ersten Event weiter, anstatt beim nächsten Mal zu etwas anderem zu wechseln?](https://www.g2.com/de/discussions/which-event-registration-platforms-do-event-teams-actually-stick-with-after-the-first-event-rather-than-switching-to-something-else-next-time)

## Spotlight-Kategorien
- [Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Software](https://www.g2.com/de/categories/robotic-process-automation-rpa)
- [Drittanbieter- und Lieferantenrisikomanagement-Software](https://www.g2.com/de/categories/third-party-supplier-risk-management)
- [Digitale Erlebnisplattformen (DXP)](https://www.g2.com/de/categories/digital-experience-platforms-dxp)