Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Zephyr Enterprise and testomat.io 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Kualitee
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Testiny
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (41.6% of reviews)
Small-Business (61.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Zephyr Enterprise
Star Rating
(80)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (41.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Zephyr Enterprisetestomat.io
Star Rating
(85)4.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (61.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about testomat.ioSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Zephyr Enterprise has a solid Test Repository feature, scoring 8.8, but testomat.io outshines it with a score of 9.4, indicating a more comprehensive and user-friendly approach to managing test cases.
- Reviewers mention that while both products offer good integration capabilities, Zephyr Enterprise scores 8.3, whereas testomat.io achieves a higher score of 9.2, suggesting that testomat.io provides a more seamless experience with third-party tools.
- G2 users highlight that test diversity is a strong point for both products, but testomat.io's score of 9.4 compared to Zephyr's 8.9 indicates that testomat.io offers a wider range of testing options, which is crucial for teams with varied testing needs.
- Users on G2 report that the quality of support for testomat.io is exceptional, with a score of 9.8, significantly higher than Zephyr Enterprise's 8.3, suggesting that users may find more responsive and helpful support with testomat.io.
- Reviewers say that the automation features in Zephyr Enterprise are robust, scoring 9.8 for organization, but testomat.io excels in reliability and thoroughness, both scoring 9.6, indicating a more dependable automation experience overall.
- Users report that the product direction for testomat.io is highly rated at 9.7, compared to Zephyr's 7.1, suggesting that testomat.io is perceived as having a more promising roadmap and commitment to future enhancements.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Zephyr Enterprise
No pricing availabletestomat.io
No pricing availableFree Trial
Zephyr Enterprise
Free Trial is available
testomat.io
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.3
69
9.3
70
Ease of Use
7.8
71
9.3
73
Ease of Setup
8.4
39
9.1
55
Ease of Admin
8.6
38
9.2
22
Quality of Support
8.2
55
9.8
69
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.3
33
9.8
17
Product Direction (% positive)
7.1
69
9.8
69
Features by Category
Functionality
8.9
11
9.4
55
8.0
11
9.2
55
8.5
12
9.4
56
Management
9.1
11
9.4
58
8.0
9
9.1
50
7.6
9
9.3
47
Functionality
Not enough data
9.5
31
Not enough data
9.4
31
Not enough data
9.1
32
Not enough data
9.4
32
Automation
Not enough data
9.6
32
Not enough data
9.4
31
Not enough data
9.6
31
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
8.1
8
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
8.1
7
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
8.3
7
Not enough data
8.1
6
Not enough data
7.8
6
AI Test Generation & Authoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Test Maintenance & Resilience
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Execution & Analytics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Zephyr Enterprise and testomat.io are categorized as Software Testing, Automation Testing, and Test Management
Unique Categories
Zephyr Enterprise has no unique categories
testomat.io is categorized as AI Software Testing Tools
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Zephyr Enterprise
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
testomat.io
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
22.1%
Information Technology and Services
19.5%
Telecommunications
6.5%
Marketing and Advertising
3.9%
Internet
3.9%
Other
44.2%
Computer Software
25.9%
Information Technology and Services
16.0%
Program Development
9.9%
Internet
3.7%
Hospital & Health Care
3.7%
Other
40.7%
Alternatives
Discussions
Zephyr Enterprise has no discussions with answers
testomat.io has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
