Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Virtuoso QA and mabl 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Qase
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Postman
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
QuerySurge
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (51.3% of reviews)
Mid-Market (44.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Contact Us Per Year
Virtuoso QA
Star Rating
(116)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (51.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Virtuoso QAmabl
Star Rating
(37)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (44.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us Per Year
Learn more about mablSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that mabl excels in its Test Feedback feature, scoring 9.1, which allows for quick identification of issues during testing. In contrast, Virtuoso QA's score of 8.7 indicates it may not provide feedback as effectively, leading to potential delays in issue resolution.
- Reviewers mention that mabl's Test History functionality, rated at 9.2, offers a comprehensive view of past tests, making it easier to track changes and improvements over time. Virtuoso QA, with a score of 8.7, may not provide the same depth of historical insights, which could hinder long-term project tracking.
- G2 users highlight mabl's superior Quality of Support with a score of 9.2, indicating that users feel well-supported during their testing processes. Conversely, Virtuoso QA's score of 8.8 suggests that while support is good, it may not be as responsive or helpful as mabl's.
- Users on G2 report that mabl's Customization options, rated at 8.8, allow for tailored testing environments that fit specific project needs. In comparison, Virtuoso QA's score of 8.1 indicates limitations in customization, which could restrict users' ability to adapt the software to their workflows.
- Reviewers mention that mabl's Reliability score of 9.0 reflects its consistent performance during testing, which is crucial for maintaining project timelines. Virtuoso QA's score of 8.6 suggests that while it is generally reliable, there may be occasional issues that could disrupt testing processes.
- Users say that mabl's Product Direction score of 8.7 indicates a strong commitment to evolving the product based on user feedback, while Virtuoso QA's higher score of 9.4 suggests it may be more proactive in implementing user-requested features and improvements.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Virtuoso QA
No pricing availablemabl
Personalized Pricing
Contact Us
Per Year
Pricing is customized to your test coverage and scalability needs.
- Your pricing session will include:
- A custom quote
- ROI analysis
Free Trial
Virtuoso QA
No trial information availablemabl
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.5
90
8.6
28
Ease of Use
8.9
93
9.0
28
Ease of Setup
8.6
37
8.8
11
Ease of Admin
8.1
24
9.0
5
Quality of Support
8.7
91
9.2
28
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.4
24
9.3
5
Product Direction (% positive)
9.4
93
8.7
26
Features by Category
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reporting
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
8.6
59
9.1
17
8.7
61
9.2
17
8.1
59
8.8
17
8.4
58
8.5
17
Automation
8.7
55
8.3
16
8.6
60
9.0
17
8.4
58
8.8
17
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Test Generation & Authoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Test Maintenance & Resilience
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Execution & Analytics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Virtuoso QA and mabl are categorized as Automation Testing and AI Software Testing Tools
Unique Categories
Virtuoso QA has no unique categories
mabl is categorized as Software Testing and Load Testing Tools
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Virtuoso QA
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
mabl
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
23.5%
Computer Software
21.7%
Retail
4.3%
Financial Services
4.3%
Apparel & Fashion
3.5%
Other
42.6%
Computer Software
30.6%
Leisure, Travel & Tourism
5.6%
Insurance
5.6%
Higher Education
5.6%
Computer & Network Security
5.6%
Other
47.2%
Alternatives
Discussions
Virtuoso QA has no discussions with answers
What does mabl do?
1 Comment
CS
Quick answer: Mabl allows you to automate repetitive manual tests. Long answer: Mabl allows you to take a task that you must test prior to each release and...Read more
Who uses mabl?
1 Comment
GG
Any company with a Software Quality Assurance department in need for functional test automation needs.
It can cover Web, Cross-browser, and API...Read more
Does mabl use Selenium?
1 Comment
GG
mabl does not use Selenium under the hood, it's mostly a combination of proprietary coding techniques and some Playwright libraries. Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
