Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Universal Background Screening and i3screen 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Mitratech AssureHire
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
RefNow
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (57.1% of reviews)
Mid-Market (72.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Universal Background Screening
Star Rating
(16)3.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (57.1% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Universal Background Screeningi3screen
Star Rating
(11)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (72.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about i3screenSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Universal Background Screening has a solid compliance rating of 9.0, which is crucial for businesses needing to adhere to legal standards, while i3screen also excels in compliance with a similar score, but reviewers mention that its dashboard for compliance tracking is more intuitive and user-friendly.
- Reviewers mention that the drug testing administration features in i3screen, particularly the real-time tracking and alerts, are rated higher (8.8 and 8.5 respectively) compared to Universal Background Screening, which has lower ratings in these areas, indicating a more robust and responsive system for drug testing.
- G2 users highlight that the ease of use for i3screen is rated at 8.9, making it more user-friendly than Universal Background Screening's score of 8.3, suggesting that i3screen may require less training and onboarding time for new users.
- Users on G2 report that the dashboard functionality in i3screen is rated at 9.3, significantly higher than Universal Background Screening's 8.0, indicating that i3screen provides a more comprehensive and visually appealing interface for managing background checks.
- Reviewers mention that while both products offer integrations, Universal Background Screening has a lower integration score of 7.7, which may limit its compatibility with other systems compared to i3screen's more favorable integration capabilities.
- Users say that the quality of support for i3screen is rated at 8.3, which is better than Universal Background Screening's score of 7.6, suggesting that i3screen may provide more responsive and effective customer service when issues arise.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Universal Background Screening
No pricing availablei3screen
No pricing availableFree Trial
Universal Background Screening
No trial information availablei3screen
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.0
11
8.5
9
Ease of Use
8.3
11
8.9
9
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
8.7
5
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.9
6
Quality of Support
7.6
11
8.3
9
Quality of Work
Not enough data
Not enough data
Responsiveness
Not enough data
Not enough data
Expertise of Team
Not enough data
Not enough data
Execution Ability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication Skills
Not enough data
Not enough data
Professionalism
Not enough data
Not enough data
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.3
6
Product Direction (% positive)
7.9
11
8.5
8
Features by Category
Planning
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Delivery
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Drug Testing Administration
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
9.0
7
Not enough data
9.8
7
Not enough data
8.3
6
Drug Testing Data
Not enough data
8.8
8
Not enough data
8.5
8
Drug Testing Additional Functionality
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
9.2
6
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Team Quality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Universal Background Screening and i3screen share no categories
Unique Categories
Universal Background Screening is categorized as Background Check Services
i3screen is categorized as Drug Testing
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Universal Background Screening
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
i3screen
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Staffing and Recruiting
28.6%
Hospital & Health Care
28.6%
Construction
14.3%
Retail
7.1%
Non-Profit Organization Management
7.1%
Other
14.3%
Hospital & Health Care
18.2%
Food & Beverages
18.2%
Staffing and Recruiting
9.1%
Information Technology and Services
9.1%
Information Services
9.1%
Other
36.4%
Alternatives
Discussions
Universal Background Screening has no discussions with answers
i3screen has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
