Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Turbo360 and nOps 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Finout
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Site24x7
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Komodor
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (43.3% of reviews)
Small-Business (54.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free
Turbo360
Star Rating
(61)4.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (43.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about Turbo360nOps
Star Rating
(138)4.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (54.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Free Trial is available
Browse all 5 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Turbo360 excels in Automation with a perfect score of 10.0, allowing for seamless task automation, while nOps scores 9.0, indicating it may not be as robust in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Turbo360's Scheduling feature is highly rated at 9.8, making it easy to manage tasks efficiently, whereas nOps falls behind with a score of 8.7, suggesting less flexibility in scheduling capabilities.
- G2 users highlight Turbo360's superior Usage Monitoring capabilities, scoring 9.8, which provides detailed insights into resource usage, compared to nOps' score of 9.1, indicating a less comprehensive monitoring experience.
- Users on G2 note that Turbo360's Data Security features are rated at 9.4, showcasing strong data protection measures, while nOps scores slightly lower at 9.0, which may raise concerns for users prioritizing security.
- Reviewers say that Turbo360's Cloud Optimization feature is rated 9.0, helping users effectively manage cloud resources, while nOps' score of 8.9 suggests it may not offer the same level of optimization tools.
- Users report that Turbo360's Compliance Monitoring is rated at 9.1, ensuring adherence to regulations, whereas nOps does not have a specific score for this feature, which could be a drawback for compliance-focused organizations.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Turbo360
No pricing availableFree Trial
Turbo360
Free Trial is available
nOps
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.6
55
8.9
97
Ease of Use
9.6
56
9.0
100
Ease of Setup
9.7
29
9.1
54
Ease of Admin
9.3
19
9.0
50
Quality of Support
9.4
55
9.5
95
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.5
19
9.3
50
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
56
9.7
85
Features by Category
Operations
9.8
7
8.7
57
10.0
7
9.0
62
Feature Not Available
8.5
58
9.8
7
9.1
63
Cost Optimization
9.8
7
9.3
68
9.8
7
8.9
65
9.8
7
9.3
68
Administration
10.0
7
9.1
65
9.5
7
8.9
67
9.3
7
9.0
59
Agentic AI - Cloud Cost Management
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
9.1
21
Not enough data
9.0
19
Not enough data
9.0
18
Not enough data
9.2
16
Compliance
Not enough data
9.1
19
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.0
17
Administration
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.4
20
Not enough data
8.6
18
Data Protection
Not enough data
9.1
18
Not enough data
9.2
19
Not enough data
9.4
18
Not enough data
9.1
20
Not enough data
9.1
20
Analysis
Not enough data
9.0
20
Not enough data
9.1
21
Not enough data
9.4
20
Administration
Not enough data
9.2
21
Not enough data
9.0
21
Not enough data
9.3
20
Monitoring
9.7
24
Not enough data
9.5
24
Not enough data
9.6
24
Not enough data
9.7
24
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Administration
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Analysis
9.5
25
Not enough data
9.6
25
Not enough data
9.6
25
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Cloud Infrastructure Monitoring
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Automation - Cloud Infrastructure Monitoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Feature Not Available
8.9
28
Feature Not Available
8.8
27
9.0
13
8.9
29
Management
8.6
14
9.5
29
Feature Not Available
9.0
29
8.5
14
9.2
29
Feature Not Available
8.8
27
Agentic AI - Cloud Management Platforms
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Configuration
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
9.3
5
Visibility
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
9.3
5
Vulnerability Management
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
9.4
6
Not enough data
9.4
6
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Turbo360 and nOps are categorized as Cloud Management Platforms and Cloud Cost Management
Unique Categories
Turbo360 is categorized as Cloud Infrastructure Monitoring
nOps is categorized as Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM), Cloud Compliance, and Cloud Data Security
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Turbo360
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
nOps
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
18.3%
Computer Software
16.7%
Accounting
8.3%
Hospital & Health Care
6.7%
Consulting
5.0%
Other
45.0%
Computer Software
26.4%
Information Technology and Services
24.8%
Computer & Network Security
7.8%
Human Resources
5.4%
Outsourcing/Offshoring
3.1%
Other
32.6%
Alternatives
Discussions
How can i get the Cloud Docs Preview for Exporting the Azure Reports.
1 Comment
Official Response from Turbo360
The particular feature is now renamed Azure Documenter. It helps to automatically document your Azure infrastructure, along with its resource usage and...Read more
Is there a way to export the Azure cost reports?
1 Comment
Official Response from Turbo360
Yes, that's possible! You can get cost reports for different teams like Finance and Engineers. This feature proves particularly useful in aligning financial...Read more
where can i get the road map of the product?
1 Comment
Official Response from Turbo360
Check out the monthly releases to know where Serverless360 is headed as an Azure Management Platform: https://docs.serverless360.com/docs/july-2023Read more
Does nOps offers Azure Cloud Management?
2 Comments
LE
Yes, nOps does offer cloud management for Azure. Read more
What are some of nOps cost optimization features?
1 Comment
LE
With nOps, you can:
Track infrastructure costs by project, AWS and Azure account, resource & employee.
Get real-time notifications of billing...Read more
How does ShareSave ensures maximum savings on your reserved instances?
1 Comment
LE
The ShareSave AI engine collects Amazon CloudWatch and AWS CloudTrail logs and continuously monitors and analyzes infrastructure usage data...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
