Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare Tricentis qTest and Zephyr Enterprise

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
Tricentis qTest
Tricentis qTest
Star Rating
(100)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (45.8% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about Tricentis qTest
Zephyr Enterprise
Zephyr Enterprise
Star Rating
(80)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (41.6% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Zephyr Enterprise
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • G2 reviewers report that Tricentis qTest excels in test management, with users highlighting its ability to centralize test management and provide seamless integration with tools like Jira. This integration offers real-time visibility into test execution and defects, which helps teams stay aligned.
  • Users say that Zephyr Enterprise is effective for organizing tests, allowing categorization into directories and tracking executed tests. This feature is particularly appreciated for its ability to add screenshots to individual tests, enhancing clarity and documentation.
  • Reviewers mention that Tricentis qTest provides a more user-friendly experience, with a focus on ease of use. Users find it easy to create and execute test cases, with one reviewer noting the efficiency of creating multiple test suites based on requirements.
  • According to verified reviews, Zephyr Enterprise shines in test case execution speed, with users appreciating its ability to import test cases through spreadsheets and the quick search functionality that streamlines their workflow.
  • G2 reviewers highlight that Tricentis qTest has a higher overall satisfaction score, reflecting its strong performance in areas like quality of support and product direction. Users feel that it has been a good partner in their testing processes, with a focus on continuous improvement.
  • Users report that while Zephyr Enterprise offers good features for test diversity and reporting, it faces challenges in ease of use compared to Tricentis qTest, which is often praised for its intuitive interface and user-friendly design.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Tricentis qTest
No pricing available
Zephyr Enterprise
No pricing available
Free Trial
Tricentis qTest
Free Trial is available
Zephyr Enterprise
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.4
72
8.3
69
Ease of Use
8.4
74
7.8
71
Ease of Setup
8.0
38
8.4
39
Ease of Admin
7.9
20
8.6
38
Quality of Support
8.4
70
8.2
55
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.2
21
8.3
33
Product Direction (% positive)
9.1
80
7.1
69
Features by Category
8.3
30
8.4
12
Functionality
8.6
27
8.9
11
8.0
29
8.0
11
8.5
28
8.5
12
Management
8.3
28
9.1
11
8.2
27
8.0
9
8.1
26
7.6
9
8.9
16
Not enough data
Functionality
9.1
15
Not enough data
9.0
16
Not enough data
8.5
16
Not enough data
9.2
15
Not enough data
Automation
9.1
15
Not enough data
9.0
15
Not enough data
8.8
15
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
7.5
11
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
7.9
11
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.0
10
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Tricentis qTest
Tricentis qTest
Zephyr Enterprise
Zephyr Enterprise
Tricentis qTest and Zephyr Enterprise are categorized as Software Testing, Automation Testing, and Test Management
Unique Categories
Tricentis qTest
Tricentis qTest has no unique categories
Zephyr Enterprise
Zephyr Enterprise has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Tricentis qTest
Tricentis qTest
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
27.1%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
45.8%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
27.1%
Zephyr Enterprise
Zephyr Enterprise
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
41.6%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
35.1%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
23.4%
Reviewers' Industry
Tricentis qTest
Tricentis qTest
Information Technology and Services
27.1%
Computer Software
22.9%
Financial Services
7.3%
Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
5.2%
Hospital & Health Care
4.2%
Other
33.3%
Zephyr Enterprise
Zephyr Enterprise
Computer Software
22.1%
Information Technology and Services
19.5%
Telecommunications
6.5%
Marketing and Advertising
3.9%
Internet
3.9%
Other
44.2%
Alternatives
Tricentis qTest
Tricentis qTest Alternatives
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Add BrowserStack
OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Application Quality Management
Add OpenText Application Quality Management
QMetry Test Management
QMetry Test Management
Add QMetry Test Management
TestRail
TestRail
Add TestRail
Zephyr Enterprise
Zephyr Enterprise Alternatives
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Add BrowserStack
Qase
Qase
Add Qase
OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Application Quality Management
Add OpenText Application Quality Management
QMetry Test Management
QMetry Test Management
Add QMetry Test Management
Discussions
Tricentis qTest
Tricentis qTest Discussions
Does qTest integrate with JIRA?
1 Comment
Official Response from Tricentis qTest
qTest integrates with JIRA Cloud and JIRA Server, while also providing qTest Cloud or Server deployment options. See this video here:...Read more
On-Boarding, Training, and continued support is a must have for any tool we adopt. How does QASymphony fit into our success?
1 Comment
Official Response from Tricentis qTest
Keeping our customers happy is a top priority, and it shows. We consistently get top satisfaction scores across the board. Check out our customer info...Read more
What is frequency of updates/releases?
1 Comment
Official Response from Tricentis qTest
At QASymphony, we are releasing new features and product improvements throughout the year. Right now we are targeting to release between 8 - 10 times a...Read more
Zephyr Enterprise
Zephyr Enterprise Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
Zephyr Enterprise has no discussions with answers