Compare Tricentis qTest and testomat.io 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (46.4% of reviews)
Small-Business (62.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Tricentis qTest
Star Rating
(101)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (46.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Tricentis qTesttestomat.io
Star Rating
(87)4.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (62.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about testomat.ioSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that testomat.io excels in user experience, with a notably intuitive and user-friendly interface. Users appreciate how easy it is to create and manage test cases, making it accessible even for newcomers, while Tricentis qTest, although effective, has received mixed feedback regarding its ease of use.
- According to verified reviews, testomat.io shines in its quality of support, with users highlighting the team's responsiveness and ability to provide tailored solutions. In contrast, while Tricentis qTest offers solid support, it does not match the high praise that testomat.io receives in this area.
- Users say that Tricentis qTest is particularly strong in test case management, allowing for the easy reuse of test cases and seamless integration with tools like Jira. This feature is frequently mentioned as a time-saver that enhances quality, whereas testomat.io, while effective, does not have the same level of recognition for this specific capability.
- Reviewers mention that testomat.io's integration capabilities are robust, enabling teams to link test suites directly to Jira, which facilitates collaboration between QA and development. Tricentis qTest also offers integration, but users have noted that it may not be as seamless as that of testomat.io.
- According to recent user feedback, both products have their strengths, but testomat.io has a slight edge in implementation speed and ease of setup, with users reporting a smoother onboarding experience compared to Tricentis qTest, which has faced some configuration challenges.
- G2 reviewers highlight that while Tricentis qTest has a strong presence in the mid-market segment, testomat.io is favored by small businesses, indicating that it may be better suited for teams looking for a more tailored solution. This distinction can influence the choice depending on the size and needs of the organization.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Tricentis qTest
No pricing availabletestomat.io
No pricing availableFree Trial
Tricentis qTest
Free Trial is available
testomat.io
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.4
73
9.3
71
Ease of Use
8.4
75
9.3
74
Ease of Setup
8.0
39
9.1
56
Ease of Admin
7.9
21
9.2
23
Quality of Support
8.4
71
9.7
70
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.3
22
9.7
18
Product Direction (% positive)
9.1
81
9.8
70
Features by Category
Functionality
8.6
27
9.4
56
8.1
30
9.2
55
8.5
28
9.4
56
Management
8.3
28
9.4
59
8.2
27
9.1
50
8.1
26
9.3
48
Functionality
9.1
15
9.5
31
9.0
16
9.4
31
8.5
16
9.1
32
9.2
15
9.4
32
Automation
9.1
15
9.6
32
9.0
15
9.4
31
8.8
15
9.6
31
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
8.1
8
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
8.1
7
Agentic AI - Software Testing
7.9
11
8.3
7
7.5
10
8.1
6
7.0
10
7.8
6
AI Test Generation & Authoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Test Maintenance & Resilience
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Execution & Analytics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Tricentis qTest and testomat.io are categorized as Software Testing, Automation Testing, and Test Management
Unique Categories
Tricentis qTest has no unique categories
testomat.io is categorized as AI Software Testing Tools
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Tricentis qTest
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
testomat.io
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
26.8%
Computer Software
23.7%
Financial Services
7.2%
Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
5.2%
Health, Wellness and Fitness
4.1%
Other
33.0%
Computer Software
25.6%
Information Technology and Services
15.9%
Program Development
9.8%
Health, Wellness and Fitness
3.7%
Hospital & Health Care
3.7%
Other
41.5%
Alternatives
Discussions
Does qTest integrate with JIRA?
1 Comment
Official Response from Tricentis qTest
qTest integrates with JIRA Cloud and JIRA Server, while also providing qTest Cloud or Server deployment options.
See this video here:...Read more
On-Boarding, Training, and continued support is a must have for any tool we adopt. How does QASymphony fit into our success?
1 Comment
Official Response from Tricentis qTest
Keeping our customers happy is a top priority, and it shows. We consistently get top satisfaction scores across the board.
Check out our customer info...Read more
What is frequency of updates/releases?
1 Comment
Official Response from Tricentis qTest
At QASymphony, we are releasing new features and product improvements throughout the year. Right now we are targeting to release between 8 - 10 times a...Read more
testomat.io has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
