Users report that ZooKeeper excels in data security with a score of 9.8, making it a preferred choice for enterprises that prioritize safeguarding sensitive information. In contrast, Traefik, while still strong, has not been highlighted as a leader in this area.
Reviewers mention that ZooKeeper's orchestration capabilities score 8.7, which is beneficial for managing distributed systems effectively. Traefik, however, shines in traffic control with a score of 9.2, allowing users to manage and route traffic efficiently.
G2 users highlight that ZooKeeper has a higher score in scalability at 9.4, which is crucial for businesses expecting growth. Traefik, while also scalable, does not match this level of performance according to user feedback.
Users on G2 report that ZooKeeper's API testing capabilities score 8.1, which some find lacking compared to Traefik's robust API management features, particularly in API monitoring, which scores 8.6.
Reviewers mention that ZooKeeper has a solid ease of setup score of 8.3, but Traefik slightly edges it out with a score of 8.4, indicating a marginally smoother onboarding experience for new users.
Users say that both products have a good quality of support, with ZooKeeper scoring 8.5 and Traefik at 8.2, but some reviewers feel that ZooKeeper's support is more responsive and helpful in critical situations.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Traefik
OSS Application Proxy
Free
Effortlessly expose your microservices to the internet.
Zookeeper is a unit where the information regarding configuration, naming and group services are stored. It is a centralized unit and using these...Read more
Does Kafka still need ZooKeeper?
1 Comment
AN
Zookeeper is required for running Kafka for the current version (3.2.3) and previous versions. However, Kafka is planning to work independently of Zookeeper...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.