Users report that TCP TimeClock Plus excels in "Time, Attendance, and PTO" management with a score of 8.7, while factoHR's score of 8.0 in the same area indicates it may not be as robust in handling complex attendance scenarios.
Reviewers mention that TCP TimeClock Plus offers superior "Expense Management" features, scoring 9.0, which is significantly higher than factoHR's 7.4, suggesting that users may find TCP's expense tracking more comprehensive and user-friendly.
G2 users highlight the ease of use in factoHR, with a score of 9.2 for "Ease of Use," compared to TCP TimeClock Plus's 8.6, indicating that users may find factoHR's interface more intuitive and accessible for everyday tasks.
Users on G2 report that TCP TimeClock Plus has a strong "Quality of Support" rating of 8.7, which is slightly better than factoHR's 8.5, suggesting that users may experience more responsive customer service with TCP.
Reviewers mention that TCP TimeClock Plus shines in "Payroll Entry" with a score of 8.8, while factoHR's lack of a score in this area may indicate a gap in its payroll functionalities, potentially affecting users who prioritize payroll management.
Users say that TCP TimeClock Plus provides better "Dashboards & Reporting" capabilities, scoring 8.3, compared to factoHR's 7.7, which may lead to more insightful data analysis and reporting for users relying on these features for decision-making.
Mobileclock TCP!! ; )
Although I have a suggestion...the "arrow" at the bottom is so shallow it doesn't look like a swipe-up arrow and people don't know...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.