Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Testsigma and mabl 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
QuerySurge
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
PFLB
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Testiny
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (48.6% of reviews)
Mid-Market (44.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
Contact Us Per Year
Testsigma
Star Rating
(107)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (48.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
Free Trial is available
Browse all 2 pricing plansmabl
Star Rating
(37)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (44.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us Per Year
Learn more about mablSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Testsigma excels in its Test Feedback feature, scoring 8.7, which allows for detailed insights into test results, while mabl shines with a higher score of 9.1, providing more intuitive and actionable feedback that users find easier to interpret.
- Reviewers mention that Testsigma's Test History feature, with a score of 8.8, offers a solid overview of past tests, but mabl outperforms with a score of 9.2, enabling users to track changes and improvements over time more effectively.
- G2 users highlight that Testsigma's Customization options, rated at 8.3, are beneficial for tailoring tests to specific needs, but mabl's higher score of 8.8 indicates a more flexible and user-friendly customization process that many find enhances their testing experience.
- Users on G2 report that Testsigma's Reliability is rated at 7.7, which some find lacking during peak testing times, whereas mabl's score of 9.0 suggests a more dependable performance, especially under stress testing scenarios.
- Reviewers mention that Testsigma's Thoroughness in testing, with a score of 8.6, is commendable, but mabl's score of 8.8 indicates a more comprehensive approach to ensuring all aspects of the application are tested, which users appreciate.
- Users say that while both products have strong support, Testsigma's Quality of Support is rated at 9.3, slightly higher than mabl's 9.2, indicating that users feel more satisfied with the responsiveness and helpfulness of Testsigma's support team.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Testsigma
Pro (Per month, billed yearly)
Contact Us
- Unlimited users
- Unlimited automated testing minutes/ month
- 1000+ desktop browser/OS combos
mabl
Personalized Pricing
Contact Us
Per Year
Pricing is customized to your test coverage and scalability needs.
- Your pricing session will include:
- A custom quote
- ROI analysis
Free Trial
Testsigma
Free Trial is available
mabl
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.6
101
8.6
28
Ease of Use
8.9
100
9.0
28
Ease of Setup
8.8
83
8.8
11
Ease of Admin
9.4
28
9.0
5
Quality of Support
9.0
100
9.2
28
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.3
27
9.3
5
Product Direction (% positive)
9.4
96
8.7
26
Features by Category
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reporting
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
9.0
10
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
8.3
11
Not enough data
Management
8.8
8
Not enough data
8.9
9
Not enough data
8.9
9
Not enough data
Functionality
8.5
65
9.1
17
8.8
66
9.2
17
8.2
70
8.8
17
8.4
65
8.5
17
Automation
7.9
61
8.3
16
8.4
68
9.0
17
8.5
63
8.8
17
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
8.4
30
Not enough data
8.2
32
Not enough data
7.8
31
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
8.1
20
Not enough data
7.9
21
Not enough data
7.6
21
Not enough data
AI Test Generation & Authoring
8.8
7
Not enough data
9.4
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
Test Maintenance & Resilience
8.5
8
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
8.6
7
Not enough data
Execution & Analytics
8.9
6
Not enough data
8.1
6
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Testsigma and mabl are categorized as AI Software Testing Tools, Software Testing, and Automation Testing
Unique Categories
Testsigma is categorized as Test Management
mabl is categorized as Load Testing Tools
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Testsigma
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
mabl
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
29.0%
Information Technology and Services
22.4%
Financial Services
8.4%
Banking
5.6%
Food & Beverages
3.7%
Other
30.8%
Computer Software
30.6%
Leisure, Travel & Tourism
5.6%
Insurance
5.6%
Higher Education
5.6%
Computer & Network Security
5.6%
Other
47.2%
Alternatives
Discussions
Testsigma has no discussions with answers
What does mabl do?
1 Comment
CS
Quick answer: Mabl allows you to automate repetitive manual tests. Long answer: Mabl allows you to take a task that you must test prior to each release and...Read more
Who uses mabl?
1 Comment
GG
Any company with a Software Quality Assurance department in need for functional test automation needs.
It can cover Web, Cross-browser, and API...Read more
Does mabl use Selenium?
1 Comment
GG
mabl does not use Selenium under the hood, it's mostly a combination of proprietary coding techniques and some Playwright libraries. Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
