Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare TestLink and Tricentis qTest

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
TestLink
TestLink
Star Rating
(62)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (50.8% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about TestLink
Tricentis qTest
Tricentis qTest
Star Rating
(100)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (45.8% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about Tricentis qTest
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that Tricentis qTest excels in its Test Feedback feature, achieving a score of 9.2, which reviewers say provides comprehensive insights into test results and facilitates better decision-making compared to TestLink's feedback capabilities.
  • Reviewers mention that Tricentis qTest's Test History feature, rated at 9.0, allows for easy tracking of past test executions, while TestLink's history management is perceived as less intuitive, impacting user experience.
  • G2 users highlight Tricentis qTest's superior Test Variety score of 9.2, indicating a broader range of testing types supported, which users say enhances flexibility in testing strategies compared to TestLink's offerings.
  • Users on G2 appreciate Tricentis qTest's robust Reporting capabilities, scoring 8.2, which reviewers say provide detailed analytics and visualizations, whereas TestLink's reporting features, rated at 8.5, are seen as less user-friendly and lacking in depth.
  • Reviewers mention that Tricentis qTest's Version Control, with a score of 8.7, is more effective in managing test case versions, while TestLink's versioning is noted to be less comprehensive, leading to potential confusion in test management.
  • Users say that Tricentis qTest's Integration capabilities, rated at 8.1, are more seamless with popular CI/CD tools, which reviewers report enhances workflow efficiency, whereas TestLink's integration options are viewed as more limited and less flexible.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
TestLink
No pricing available
Tricentis qTest
No pricing available
Free Trial
TestLink
No trial information available
Tricentis qTest
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.5
56
8.4
72
Ease of Use
7.8
53
8.4
74
Ease of Setup
7.5
8
8.0
38
Ease of Admin
7.6
9
7.9
20
Quality of Support
8.1
53
8.4
70
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.5
8
8.2
21
Product Direction (% positive)
8.1
56
9.1
80
Features by Category
8.4
40
8.3
30
Functionality
8.7
38
8.6
27
7.8
36
8.0
29
8.5
38
8.5
28
Management
8.5
38
8.3
28
8.4
38
8.2
27
8.3
37
8.1
26
Not enough data
8.9
16
Functionality
Not enough data
9.1
15
Not enough data
9.0
16
Not enough data
8.5
16
Not enough data
9.2
15
Automation
Not enough data
9.1
15
Not enough data
9.0
15
Not enough data
8.8
15
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
7.5
11
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
7.9
11
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.0
10
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
TestLink
TestLink
Tricentis qTest
Tricentis qTest
TestLink and Tricentis qTest are categorized as Software Testing and Test Management
Unique Categories
TestLink
TestLink has no unique categories
Tricentis qTest
Tricentis qTest is categorized as Automation Testing
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
TestLink
TestLink
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
18.0%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
31.1%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
50.8%
Tricentis qTest
Tricentis qTest
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
27.1%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
45.8%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
27.1%
Reviewers' Industry
TestLink
TestLink
Information Technology and Services
68.9%
Computer Software
11.5%
Internet
3.3%
Hospital & Health Care
3.3%
Computer & Network Security
3.3%
Other
9.8%
Tricentis qTest
Tricentis qTest
Information Technology and Services
27.1%
Computer Software
22.9%
Financial Services
7.3%
Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
5.2%
Hospital & Health Care
4.2%
Other
33.3%
Alternatives
TestLink
TestLink Alternatives
TestRail
TestRail
Add TestRail
PractiTest
PractiTest
Add PractiTest
OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Application Quality Management
Add OpenText Application Quality Management
Zephyr Enterprise
Zephyr Enterprise
Add Zephyr Enterprise
Tricentis qTest
Tricentis qTest Alternatives
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Add BrowserStack
OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Application Quality Management
Add OpenText Application Quality Management
Zephyr Enterprise
Zephyr Enterprise
Add Zephyr Enterprise
QMetry Test Management
QMetry Test Management
Add QMetry Test Management
Discussions
TestLink
TestLink Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
TestLink has no discussions with answers
Tricentis qTest
Tricentis qTest Discussions
Does qTest integrate with JIRA?
1 Comment
Official Response from Tricentis qTest
qTest integrates with JIRA Cloud and JIRA Server, while also providing qTest Cloud or Server deployment options. See this video here:...Read more
On-Boarding, Training, and continued support is a must have for any tool we adopt. How does QASymphony fit into our success?
1 Comment
Official Response from Tricentis qTest
Keeping our customers happy is a top priority, and it shows. We consistently get top satisfaction scores across the board. Check out our customer info...Read more
What is frequency of updates/releases?
1 Comment
Official Response from Tricentis qTest
At QASymphony, we are releasing new features and product improvements throughout the year. Right now we are targeting to release between 8 - 10 times a...Read more