Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare TestComplete and Xcode

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
TestComplete
TestComplete
Star Rating
(97)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (51.1% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about TestComplete
Xcode
Xcode
Star Rating
(1,003)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (54.8% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Xcode
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that TestComplete excels in its "Emulation" capabilities, scoring a remarkable 9.0, which allows for comprehensive testing across various environments, while Xcode's emulation features, although solid, do not reach the same level of versatility.
  • Reviewers mention that TestComplete's "Test Feedback" functionality is highly rated at 8.9, providing detailed insights that help teams quickly identify issues, whereas Xcode's feedback mechanisms, while effective, are rated lower at 8.8, indicating a slight edge for TestComplete in this area.
  • G2 users highlight TestComplete's superior "Multi-Language Support" with a score of 8.7, making it a preferred choice for teams working in diverse programming environments, compared to Xcode's score of 8.3, which may limit its appeal for multi-language projects.
  • Users on G2 report that TestComplete's "Customization" options are robust, scoring 8.5, allowing teams to tailor the software to their specific needs, while Xcode's customization features, rated at 8.3, are seen as more restrictive by some users.
  • Reviewers mention that TestComplete's "Help Guides" are particularly user-friendly, with a score of 8.6, which aids in onboarding and troubleshooting, whereas Xcode's help resources, rated at 8.4, are considered less comprehensive by some users.
  • Users say that TestComplete's "Automation" capabilities are highly regarded, scoring 8.6, which streamlines testing processes significantly, while Xcode's automation features, although effective, do not match the same level of efficiency, leading to a more manual approach in some cases.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
TestComplete
No pricing available
Xcode
No pricing available
Free Trial
TestComplete
Free Trial is available
Xcode
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.5
82
8.8
821
Ease of Use
8.0
82
7.8
824
Ease of Setup
7.8
36
8.0
173
Ease of Admin
7.5
35
7.9
134
Quality of Support
8.1
81
7.7
727
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.9
36
8.1
124
Product Direction (% positive)
8.3
82
7.9
798
Features by Category
C/C++ Integrated Development Environments (IDE)Hide 7 FeaturesShow 7 Features
Not enough data
8.7
70
Functionality
Not enough data
9.0
65
Not enough data
8.8
63
Not enough data
8.7
57
Not enough data
8.5
63
Not enough data
8.8
63
Not enough data
8.6
61
Not enough data
8.6
61
Not enough data
8.6
105
Functionality
Not enough data
8.7
89
Not enough data
8.5
89
Not enough data
9.0
96
Management
Not enough data
8.3
87
Not enough data
8.6
85
Not enough data
8.8
85
Application Development PlatformsHide 7 FeaturesShow 7 Features
Not enough data
8.5
67
Functionality
Not enough data
8.7
64
Not enough data
8.6
62
Not enough data
8.2
59
Not enough data
8.3
63
Not enough data
8.7
63
Not enough data
8.4
63
Not enough data
8.8
63
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Mobile Development PlatformsHide 3 FeaturesShow 3 Features
Not enough data
8.6
12
Agentic AI - Mobile Development Platforms
Not enough data
8.6
12
Not enough data
8.6
12
Not enough data
8.6
12
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
TestComplete
TestComplete
Xcode
Xcode
TestComplete and Xcode are categorized as Mobile App Testing
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
TestComplete
TestComplete
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
20.7%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
51.1%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
28.3%
Xcode
Xcode
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
54.8%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
23.5%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
21.7%
Reviewers' Industry
TestComplete
TestComplete
Computer Software
25.0%
Information Technology and Services
23.9%
Hospital & Health Care
6.5%
Financial Services
3.3%
Telecommunications
2.2%
Other
39.1%
Xcode
Xcode
Computer Software
35.9%
Information Technology and Services
18.1%
Internet
5.7%
Higher Education
3.4%
Financial Services
2.2%
Other
34.6%
Alternatives
TestComplete
TestComplete Alternatives
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Add BrowserStack
Ranorex Studio
Ranorex Studio
Add Ranorex Studio
Sauce Labs
Sauce Labs
Add Sauce Labs
Katalon Platform
Katalon Platform
Add Katalon Platform
Xcode
Xcode Alternatives
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Add Visual Studio
Eclipse
Eclipse
Add Eclipse
NetBeans
NetBeans
Add NetBeans
Android Studio
Android Studio
Add Android Studio
Discussions
TestComplete
TestComplete Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
TestComplete has no discussions with answers
Xcode
Xcode Discussions
Can we use Xcode for the hybrid apps in future?
2 Comments
Karan S.
KS
It's doubtful - Apple likes to keep their environment separate from others. iOS will continue to be its own identity and I doubt hybrid apps will be...Read more
Is Xcode good for Python?
2 Comments
Yuvraj B.
YB
no its only for swift there was objective -C also but prefer to go with swift.Read more
What is the use of Xcode in Mac?
2 Comments
vishal singh s.
VS
For application developmentRead more