Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare TestComplete and mabl 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Qase
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Postman
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
PFLB
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (51.1% of reviews)
Mid-Market (44.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Contact Us Per Year
TestComplete
Star Rating
(97)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (51.1% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about TestCompletemabl
Star Rating
(37)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (44.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us Per Year
Learn more about mablSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that TestComplete excels in its comprehensive test variety, allowing for a wide range of testing scenarios, while mabl is noted for its ease of use, making it more accessible for teams new to automated testing.
- Reviewers mention that mabl's quality of support is significantly higher, with a G2 rating of 9.2 compared to TestComplete's 8.1, indicating that users feel more supported when using mabl.
- G2 users highlight TestComplete's robust reporting features, particularly its Test History and thoroughness, which provide detailed insights into test results, whereas mabl's reporting is simpler but effective for quick overviews.
- Users on G2 indicate that TestComplete has a steeper learning curve due to its extensive customization options, rated at 8.8, while mabl's ease of setup, rated at 8.8, allows teams to get started quickly without extensive training.
- Reviewers say that mabl shines in its automation organization capabilities, rated at 9.0, which helps teams manage their automated tests more efficiently compared to TestComplete's rating of 8.3 in this area.
- Users report that both products have strong functionality, but TestComplete's ability to handle extreme cases and stress testing is a standout feature, making it a preferred choice for more complex testing environments.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
TestComplete
No pricing availablemabl
Personalized Pricing
Contact Us
Per Year
Pricing is customized to your test coverage and scalability needs.
- Your pricing session will include:
- A custom quote
- ROI analysis
Free Trial
TestComplete
Free Trial is available
mabl
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.5
82
8.6
28
Ease of Use
8.0
82
9.0
28
Ease of Setup
7.8
36
8.8
11
Ease of Admin
7.5
35
9.0
5
Quality of Support
8.1
81
9.2
28
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.9
36
9.3
5
Product Direction (% positive)
8.3
82
8.7
26
Features by Category
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reporting
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
9.1
17
Not enough data
9.2
17
Not enough data
8.8
17
Not enough data
8.5
17
Automation
Not enough data
8.3
16
Not enough data
9.0
17
Not enough data
8.8
17
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Test Generation & Authoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Test Maintenance & Resilience
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Execution & Analytics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
TestComplete and mabl are categorized as Software Testing and Automation Testing
Unique Categories
TestComplete is categorized as Mobile App Testing
mabl is categorized as Load Testing Tools and AI Software Testing Tools
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
TestComplete
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
mabl
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
25.0%
Information Technology and Services
23.9%
Hospital & Health Care
6.5%
Financial Services
3.3%
Telecommunications
2.2%
Other
39.1%
Computer Software
30.6%
Leisure, Travel & Tourism
5.6%
Insurance
5.6%
Higher Education
5.6%
Computer & Network Security
5.6%
Other
47.2%
Alternatives
Discussions
TestComplete has no discussions with answers
What does mabl do?
1 Comment
CS
Quick answer: Mabl allows you to automate repetitive manual tests. Long answer: Mabl allows you to take a task that you must test prior to each release and...Read more
Who uses mabl?
1 Comment
GG
Any company with a Software Quality Assurance department in need for functional test automation needs.
It can cover Web, Cross-browser, and API...Read more
Does mabl use Selenium?
1 Comment
GG
mabl does not use Selenium under the hood, it's mostly a combination of proprietary coding techniques and some Playwright libraries. Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
