Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare SuperAnnotate and super.AI 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Roboflow
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (63.5% of reviews)
Mid-Market (50.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
No pricing available
SuperAnnotate
Star Rating
(173)4.9 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (63.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
Browse all 3 pricing planssuper.AI
Star Rating
(12)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (50.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about super.AISummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that super.AI excels in Language Flexibility with a perfect score of 10.0, allowing for seamless integration across various languages, while SuperAnnotate also scores highly but does not specify the same level of flexibility.
- Reviewers mention that SuperAnnotate shines in Quality of Support, achieving a remarkable score of 9.9, with many users highlighting the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team, whereas super.AI's support quality, while good at 8.8, does not match this level of satisfaction.
- G2 users indicate that SuperAnnotate offers superior Ease of Setup with a score of 9.6, making it more user-friendly for new users, while super.AI lacks a specific score in this area, suggesting potential challenges in initial deployment.
- Users on G2 report that super.AI has a strong focus on Scalability, scoring a perfect 10.0, which is crucial for businesses looking to grow, while SuperAnnotate, although also scalable, does not emphasize this feature as strongly.
- Reviewers mention that SuperAnnotate's Task Quality is rated at 9.7, with users praising the accuracy and reliability of the annotations, whereas super.AI, while still high at 9.8 for Labeler Quality, does not specifically highlight task performance in user reviews.
- Users say that super.AI's Human-in-the-Loop feature, rated at 9.7, is particularly beneficial for ensuring high-quality outputs, while SuperAnnotate does not provide as much detail on this aspect, leading to questions about its effectiveness in similar scenarios.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
SuperAnnotate
Pro
Contact Us
Get ready to scale your most sophisticated AI projects and MLOps needs
- Fully customizable multimodal editor
- Image, video, text, and audio editors
- Data curation and exploration
super.AI
No pricing availableFree Trial
SuperAnnotate
Free Trial is available
super.AI
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.6
113
8.3
7
Ease of Use
9.6
118
8.1
7
Ease of Setup
9.6
78
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
9.6
46
Not enough data
Quality of Support
9.7
115
8.8
7
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.7
47
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
9.5
99
8.1
6
Features by Category
Deployment
9.8
10
Not enough data
9.2
11
Not enough data
9.3
9
Not enough data
9.7
10
Not enough data
9.5
10
Not enough data
Deployment
9.4
11
Not enough data
9.5
11
Not enough data
9.5
10
Not enough data
9.4
11
Not enough data
9.3
12
Not enough data
Management
9.3
9
Not enough data
9.0
10
Not enough data
9.2
8
Not enough data
9.6
8
Not enough data
Operations
9.3
9
Not enough data
9.2
8
Not enough data
9.2
8
Not enough data
Management
9.6
8
Not enough data
9.4
8
Not enough data
9.3
7
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality
9.7
76
Not enough data
9.6
74
Not enough data
9.7
74
Not enough data
9.7
68
Not enough data
Automation
9.3
57
Not enough data
9.5
47
Not enough data
Image Annotation
9.3
70
Not enough data
9.4
67
Not enough data
9.3
59
Not enough data
9.5
61
Not enough data
Natural Language Annotation
9.3
46
Not enough data
9.2
39
Not enough data
9.6
43
Not enough data
Speech Annotation
9.2
40
Not enough data
9.0
38
Not enough data
Operating System
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Document Processing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform Additional Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - OCR
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Capture
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Extraction
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Validation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Workflow Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Document Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Machine Learning
Not enough data
Not enough data
Natural Language Processing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Semantic Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Integration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Large Language Model Operationalization (LLMOps)Hide 15 FeaturesShow 15 Features
9.5
13
Not enough data
Prompt Engineering - Large Language Model Operationalization (LLMOps)
9.6
13
Not enough data
9.6
13
Not enough data
Inference Optimization - Large Language Model Operationalization (LLMOps)
9.4
12
Not enough data
Model Garden - Large Language Model Operationalization (LLMOps)
9.6
13
Not enough data
Custom Training - Large Language Model Operationalization (LLMOps)
9.5
13
Not enough data
Application Development - Large Language Model Operationalization (LLMOps)
9.4
13
Not enough data
Model Deployment - Large Language Model Operationalization (LLMOps)
9.5
11
Not enough data
9.4
13
Not enough data
Guardrails - Large Language Model Operationalization (LLMOps)
9.5
13
Not enough data
9.6
12
Not enough data
Model Monitoring - Large Language Model Operationalization (LLMOps)
9.4
12
Not enough data
9.5
11
Not enough data
Security - Large Language Model Operationalization (LLMOps)
9.5
11
Not enough data
9.4
11
Not enough data
Gateways & Routers - Large Language Model Operationalization (LLMOps)
9.4
12
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
SuperAnnotate and super.AI are categorized as Data Labeling
Unique Categories
SuperAnnotate is categorized as MLOps Platforms and Large Language Model Operationalization (LLMOps)
super.AI is categorized as Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) and OCR
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
SuperAnnotate
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
super.AI
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
22.6%
Computer Software
16.4%
Research
6.9%
Higher Education
5.0%
Health, Wellness and Fitness
3.8%
Other
45.3%
Information Technology and Services
33.3%
Marketing and Advertising
16.7%
Computer Software
16.7%
Retail
8.3%
Health, Wellness and Fitness
8.3%
Other
16.7%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is SuperAnnotate?
1 Comment
MM
SuperAnnotate is an end-to-end platform to annotate, version, and manage ground truth data for your AI.Read more
What is your experience with SuperAnnotate for data annotation, and what would you like to see improved?
1 Comment
ST
I have been invited to skill test for a few projects with superannotate over the past year or so, each resulting in the platform being buggy and not allowing...Read more
SuperAnnotate has no more discussions with answers
super.AI has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
