Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Spatial and hubs 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (50.0% of reviews)
Small-Business (53.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Spatial
Star Rating
(12)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (50.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Spatialhubs
Star Rating
(13)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (53.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about hubsSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that "hubs" excels in ease of use with a score of 9.4, making it a preferred choice for small businesses, while "Spatial" has a lower score of 8.5, indicating a steeper learning curve for new users.
- Reviewers mention that "Spatial" shines in collaboration features, particularly with a high score of 9.6 in engagement, which is crucial for teams working together on projects, compared to "hubs" which scored 8.6 in the same area.
- G2 users highlight that "hubs" has a superior quality of support with a score of 9.6, suggesting that users feel well-supported, whereas "Spatial" received a lower score of 8.8, indicating potential gaps in customer service responsiveness.
- Users on G2 report that "Spatial" offers better avatar creation and environment customization features, scoring 9.1 in both areas, while "hubs" scored lower at 8.1 and 8.6 respectively, which may limit user personalization options.
- Reviewers mention that "hubs" has a strong score of 9.0 in the ability to work together, but "Spatial" outperforms it with a score of 9.4, suggesting that "Spatial" may provide a more seamless collaborative experience.
- Users say that "hubs" has a perfect score of 10.0 in product direction, indicating a clear and positive vision for future updates, while "Spatial" also matches this score, suggesting both products are committed to ongoing improvement.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Spatial
No pricing availablehubs
No pricing availableFree Trial
Spatial
No trial information availablehubs
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.0
10
8.9
9
Ease of Use
8.5
9
9.4
9
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
9.5
7
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
9.5
7
Quality of Support
8.8
8
9.6
8
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
9.2
6
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
10
10.0
7
Features by Category
Create
9.1
9
8.1
6
9.1
9
8.6
6
8.3
9
8.3
5
8.9
9
7.7
5
8.7
9
Not enough data
8.9
9
Not enough data
Collaborate
9.1
9
8.7
5
9.4
9
9.0
5
9.1
9
8.6
6
9.6
9
8.6
6
9.1
9
9.0
5
8.8
8
9.0
5
8.1
8
Not enough data
Industry and Functionality
8.6
7
Not enough data
8.7
9
Not enough data
8.7
9
Not enough data
8.9
9
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Spatial and hubs are categorized as VR Collaboration
Unique Categories
Spatial has no unique categories
hubs has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Spatial
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
hubs
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
16.7%
Higher Education
16.7%
Building Materials
16.7%
Outsourcing/Offshoring
8.3%
Marketing and Advertising
8.3%
Other
33.3%
Leisure, Travel & Tourism
15.4%
Law Practice
7.7%
Internet
7.7%
Information Technology and Services
7.7%
Hospitality
7.7%
Other
53.8%
Discussions
Spatial has no discussions with answers
hubs has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
