Users report that Sonix excels in accuracy with a score of 8.9, while Trint falls behind with a score of 7.6. Reviewers mention that Sonix's transcription quality is often praised for its reliability in capturing spoken words accurately.
Reviewers say that Sonix offers superior text editing capabilities, scoring 9.7 compared to Trint's 8.1. Users highlight features like intuitive editing tools that make it easier to refine transcripts quickly.
G2 users note that Sonix's timecode management is rated highly at 9.3, which is slightly better than Trint's 9.0. Users appreciate how Sonix allows for precise timing adjustments, making it ideal for video editing.
Users on G2 mention that Sonix provides a more user-friendly experience, reflected in its ease of use score of 9.7, while Trint's score of 8.7 indicates some room for improvement. Reviewers often comment on Sonix's intuitive interface.
Reviewers mention that Sonix's collaboration features score 8.7, which is a strong point, while Trint does not have a comparable feature set that stands out. Users appreciate the ability to work together seamlessly on transcripts in Sonix.
Users report that Sonix's integration capabilities, particularly with existing applications, score 7.8, which is lower than expected. In contrast, Trint's API score of 8.8 indicates a more robust integration experience, making it easier for users to connect with other tools.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Sonix (sonix.ai)
Premium
$5
hour
More frequent transcription needs with advanced collaboration tools.
I have also had trouble getting help. I sent this email to wecare@sonix.ai and have not gotten a response.
I’m a somewhat happy Sonix user. I’m using it to...Read more
Sonix (sonix.ai) has no more discussions with answers
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.