Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare SonarQube and Typo 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CAST Highlight
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Aikido Security
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Endor Labs
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (41.9% of reviews)
Mid-Market (47.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Free 10 Git Contributors
SonarQube
Star Rating
(125)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (41.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 5 pricing plansTypo
Star Rating
(149)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (47.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free 10 Git Contributors
Free Trial is available
Browse all 3 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that SonarQube's repository integration is less seamless compared to Typo, which boasts a score of 9.2. Reviewers mention that Typo's integration with various version control systems is straightforward and efficient, making it easier for teams to adopt.
- Reviewers mention that Typo excels in quality of support, scoring 9.5, while SonarQube lags behind at 8.2. Users on G2 highlight Typo's responsive customer service and extensive documentation as key benefits that enhance user experience.
- Users say that Typo's ease of use is a standout feature, with a score of 9.0, compared to SonarQube's 8.5. Reviewers appreciate Typo's intuitive interface, which simplifies navigation and reduces the learning curve for new users.
- G2 users report that Typo's product direction is more positively perceived, scoring 9.3 against SonarQube's 8.5. Reviewers mention that Typo frequently updates its features based on user feedback, ensuring the product evolves to meet user needs.
- Users on G2 highlight that SonarQube's historical data consolidation feature, scoring 7.6, is less robust than Typo's 8.5. Reviewers mention that Typo provides better tools for analyzing past performance, which is crucial for long-term project assessments.
- Reviewers mention that while both products offer testing integration, SonarQube scores slightly higher at 7.9 compared to Typo's 7.7. However, users report that SonarQube's integration with testing frameworks is more comprehensive, allowing for better code quality checks.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
SonarQube
Community Edition
Free
Explore: https://www.sonarsource.com/plans-and-pricing/
- Free
- Popular & classic languages support
- Integration with DevOps platforms
Typo
Free Plan
Free
10 Git Contributors
Our love for startups & small teams is eternal. This starter plan is dedicated to all of them. Lifetime free plan for teams of up to 10 developers.
- DORA Metrics
- Pull Request Insights
- Team Performance Insights
Free Trial
SonarQube
Free Trial is available
Typo
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.8
108
8.8
114
Ease of Use
8.5
111
8.9
117
Ease of Setup
8.1
70
8.7
78
Ease of Admin
8.5
63
8.8
43
Quality of Support
8.2
91
9.3
96
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.4
57
9.3
36
Product Direction (% positive)
8.6
105
9.3
114
Features by Category
Administration
7.8
19
Not enough data
6.0
20
Not enough data
Analysis
7.4
21
Not enough data
8.0
20
Not enough data
8.9
22
Not enough data
9.0
22
Not enough data
Testing
6.6
18
Not enough data
5.9
19
Not enough data
6.0
21
Not enough data
6.9
18
Not enough data
6.8
17
Not enough data
8.2
21
Not enough data
6.9
21
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
8.1
31
9.1
83
8.4
30
8.8
84
8.2
29
8.7
82
Management
7.7
27
8.3
83
7.5
25
8.5
82
7.8
27
7.6
80
Bug Reporting
7.7
10
Not enough data
8.0
10
Not enough data
8.3
10
Not enough data
Bug Monitoring
7.8
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
8.5
10
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Documentation
7.7
35
Not enough data
7.6
35
Not enough data
8.2
36
Not enough data
Security
6.9
33
Not enough data
7.0
32
Not enough data
7.9
33
Not enough data
Risk management - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
9.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
Integration and efficiency - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
7.8
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
Reporting and Analytics - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
7.8
6
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Compliance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Risk Management & Monitoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Lifecycle Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Access Control and Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Collaboration and Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AI Governance Tools
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Code Analysis
6.3
8
6.1
6
5.7
7
6.3
5
6.7
8
6.0
5
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Value Analysis
Not enough data
9.2
21
Not enough data
9.0
22
Not enough data
7.9
21
Not enough data
8.7
22
Value Management
Not enough data
8.5
20
Not enough data
8.3
20
Not enough data
8.5
20
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
SonarQube and Typo are categorized as Software Development Analytics Tools and Static Code Analysis
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
SonarQube
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Typo
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
26.6%
Computer Software
21.8%
Financial Services
6.5%
Hospital & Health Care
3.2%
Computer & Network Security
3.2%
Other
38.7%
Computer Software
39.3%
Information Technology and Services
21.4%
Financial Services
6.2%
Information Services
2.8%
Hospital & Health Care
2.8%
Other
27.6%
Discussions
SonarQube has no discussions with answers
Typo has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
