Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Snort and Trellix Network Detection and Response (NDR) 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Nuix Neo Investigations
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (72.2% of reviews)
Mid-Market (35.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Snort
Star Rating
(18)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (72.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about SnortTrellix Network Detection and Response (NDR)
Star Rating
(66)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (35.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Trellix Network Detection and Response (NDR)Summary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that FireEye Network Security and Forensics excels in its Intrusion Prevention capabilities, with a strong emphasis on real-time threat detection, while Snort is praised for its open-source flexibility and customization options, allowing users to tailor their intrusion detection systems to specific needs.
- Reviewers mention that FireEye's ease of use is rated at 8.0, which is slightly lower than Snort's 8.8, indicating that users find Snort more intuitive and user-friendly, especially for those new to network security.
- G2 users highlight FireEye's robust support quality, scoring 8.3, which is comparable to Snort's 8.1, suggesting that both products offer solid customer support, but FireEye may have a slight edge in responsiveness and assistance.
- Users on G2 report that FireEye's automation features, particularly in response automation, are highly effective, streamlining incident response processes, whereas Snort's automation capabilities are more limited, requiring more manual intervention.
- Reviewers mention that FireEye provides comprehensive incident management tools, including detailed incident reports and remediation suggestions, which are crucial for enterprise-level users, while Snort's incident management features are less developed, focusing more on detection than on comprehensive response.
- Users say that FireEye's continuous analysis feature is a standout, providing ongoing monitoring and threat assessment, while Snort's capabilities in this area are more basic, making FireEye a better choice for organizations needing in-depth analysis and proactive security measures.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Snort
No pricing availableTrellix Network Detection and Response (NDR)
No pricing availableFree Trial
Snort
No trial information availableTrellix Network Detection and Response (NDR)
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
6.5
18
8.6
53
Ease of Use
8.8
18
8.2
53
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
7.9
19
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.2
20
Quality of Support
8.1
18
8.0
50
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.2
19
Product Direction (% positive)
7.3
17
7.6
54
Features by Category
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems (IDPS)Hide 14 FeaturesShow 14 Features
Not enough data
8.4
20
Prevention
Not enough data
8.9
18
Not enough data
8.8
18
Not enough data
8.1
18
Not enough data
8.4
18
Not enough data
8.1
15
Detection
Not enough data
8.5
17
Not enough data
8.8
19
Not enough data
8.6
18
Administration
Not enough data
8.2
16
Not enough data
8.3
18
Not enough data
7.6
17
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems (IDPS)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Incident Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Remediation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Snort and Trellix Network Detection and Response (NDR) are categorized as Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems (IDPS)
Unique Categories
Snort has no unique categories
Trellix Network Detection and Response (NDR) is categorized as Digital Forensics and Network Traffic Analysis (NTA)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Snort
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Trellix Network Detection and Response (NDR)
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
83.3%
Information Technology and Services
11.1%
Computer & Network Security
5.6%
‐
‐
Other
0.0%
Information Technology and Services
15.6%
Financial Services
9.4%
Government Administration
4.7%
Education Management
4.7%
Computer Software
4.7%
Other
60.9%
Alternatives
Discussions
Snort has no discussions with answers
Trellix Network Detection and Response (NDR) has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
