Users report that Sentry excels in "Crash Monitoring" with a score of 9.3, providing timely alerts and constant monitoring, which reviewers say is crucial for maintaining application stability.
Reviewers mention that TrackJS shines in "Analytics" with a score of 9.4, highlighting its robust reporting features that allow for in-depth analysis of user behavior and application performance.
G2 users indicate that Sentry's "User Reports and Feedback" feature, scoring 7.5, could be improved, as some users feel it lacks the depth found in TrackJS's similar feature, which scores 8.0 and is praised for its user-friendly interface.
Users on G2 report that Sentry's "Alerting" functionality, with a score of 8.8, is effective but lacks the multi-channel alerting capabilities that TrackJS offers, which reviewers say enhances their ability to respond to issues across different platforms.
Reviewers mention that Sentry's "Performance Monitoring" is rated at 8.8, providing solid insights, but TrackJS's "Real User Monitoring (RUM)" at 8.7 is noted for its detailed second-by-second metrics, which users say helps in pinpointing performance bottlenecks more effectively.
Users say that while Sentry has a strong "Reporting" feature with a score of 8.9, TrackJS's reporting capabilities are often highlighted as more intuitive and user-friendly, making it easier for teams to generate actionable insights.
What is your primary use case for Sentry in application monitoring, and how has it impacted your development process?
1 Comment
JD
You can intergrate senty with your application to get the errors on your email or simply getting notified when your system fails or give you any kind of...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.