Users report that Sentry excels in Crash Monitoring with a score of 9.3, providing timely alerts and effective bug reporting, while Splunk Synthetic Monitoring, although strong in Incident Alerting with a score of 9.0, does not match the same level of detail in crash data analysis.
Reviewers mention that Splunk Synthetic Monitoring shines in Cloud Observability with a score of 9.1, offering comprehensive insights into cloud performance, whereas Sentry's score of 6.2 in this area indicates a gap in cloud monitoring capabilities.
G2 users highlight that Sentry's Real-Time Monitoring is rated at 8.7, which is beneficial for immediate issue detection, while Splunk's performance in this area is slightly lower at 8.2, suggesting Sentry may provide a more responsive experience.
Users on G2 report that Splunk's Synthetic Monitoring functionality is rated at 9.0, significantly outperforming Sentry's score of 6.9, indicating that Splunk offers more robust synthetic testing features for proactive monitoring.
Reviewers mention that Sentry's Ease of Setup is rated at 8.5, which is lower than Splunk's 9.4, suggesting that users may find Splunk easier to implement and integrate into their existing systems.
Users say that while both products have strong Alerting features, Sentry's score of 8.8 is slightly lower than Splunk's 9.0, indicating that Splunk may provide more effective and customizable alerting options for users.
What is your primary use case for Sentry in application monitoring, and how has it impacted your development process?
1 Comment
JD
You can intergrate senty with your application to get the errors on your email or simply getting notified when your system fails or give you any kind of...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.