Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare ScyllaDB and Supabase 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Ninox
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (40.3% of reviews)
Small-Business (85.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
ScyllaDB
Star Rating
(358)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (40.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about ScyllaDBSupabase
Star Rating
(28)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (85.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about SupabaseSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that ScyllaDB excels in scalability, with a score of 9.2, making it ideal for businesses that anticipate rapid growth. In contrast, Supabase, while also scalable, received a slightly lower score of 8.9, indicating it may not handle extreme scaling needs as effectively.
- Reviewers mention that Supabase shines in ease of setup, scoring 9.2, which is significantly higher than ScyllaDB's score of 8.2. This makes Supabase a more user-friendly option for teams looking to get started quickly without extensive configuration.
- G2 users highlight that ScyllaDB's performance analysis features, with a score of 8.5, provide deep insights into database operations, which is crucial for performance tuning. Supabase, while offering solid performance metrics, does not match this level of detail.
- Users on G2 report that Supabase's self-service authentication features are robust, scoring 9.4, which is higher than ScyllaDB's score of 8.7. This makes Supabase a better choice for applications requiring user management and authentication flexibility.
- Reviewers say that ScyllaDB's advanced data analytics capabilities, scoring 8.5, are particularly beneficial for businesses needing to derive insights from large datasets. Supabase, while functional, does not offer the same level of advanced analytics features.
- Users say that ScyllaDB's auto sharding feature, with a score of 8.6, is a standout for managing large volumes of data across distributed systems, whereas Supabase's auto sharding received a lower score of 8.5, indicating it may not be as efficient in handling data distribution.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
ScyllaDB
No pricing availableSupabase
No pricing availableFree Trial
ScyllaDB
Free Trial is available
Supabase
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.8
302
9.3
27
Ease of Use
8.6
311
8.9
28
Ease of Setup
8.3
220
9.2
23
Ease of Admin
8.2
115
9.2
11
Quality of Support
8.5
282
8.3
21
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.7
95
9.8
7
Product Direction (% positive)
9.2
294
10.0
25
Features by Category
Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)Hide 15 FeaturesShow 15 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Authentication Risk Management - Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Biometric & Behavioral Analysis - Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Context-Aware Security Controls - Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
8.3
7
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
8.3
7
Maintenance
Not enough data
9.3
7
Not enough data
9.0
7
Not enough data
8.1
7
Security
Not enough data
9.0
7
Not enough data
9.3
7
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Database Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
8.6
144
Not enough data
8.7
149
Not enough data
Availability
8.9
145
Not enough data
8.6
143
Not enough data
8.6
143
Not enough data
Performance
8.7
141
Not enough data
Security
8.3
134
Not enough data
8.5
135
Not enough data
8.4
132
Not enough data
8.5
132
Not enough data
Support
8.5
129
Not enough data
8.5
136
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
6.7
6
Not enough data
7.2
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
8.6
7
Not enough data
7.8
6
Storage
8.4
66
Not enough data
Scalability
9.0
71
Not enough data
8.6
68
Not enough data
Security
8.1
63
Not enough data
Support
8.5
70
Not enough data
8.4
69
Not enough data
8.2
65
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Wide Column Database
7.0
5
Not enough data
Data Indexing
Not enough data
8.3
11
Not enough data
8.9
11
Filters
Not enough data
8.0
11
Not enough data
8.7
10
Agentic AI - Mobile Development Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Configuration
9.2
146
9.4
6
8.8
139
8.1
6
8.9
143
9.2
6
8.4
134
9.2
6
8.7
135
9.7
6
Database Administration
8.8
136
9.7
6
8.7
131
8.9
6
8.7
131
8.3
6
Availability
9.4
144
9.4
6
8.9
141
8.3
6
8.9
134
8.9
6
8.8
140
8.9
6
Security
8.7
122
9.4
6
8.6
123
9.2
6
8.7
123
9.2
6
Data Management
8.9
132
8.3
6
8.7
126
8.3
6
Database Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
ScyllaDB and Supabase are categorized as Database as a Service (DBaaS)
Unique Categories
ScyllaDB is categorized as Key Value Databases and Wide Column Database
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
ScyllaDB
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Supabase
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
29.4%
Information Technology and Services
12.7%
Financial Services
5.8%
Banking
3.7%
Education Management
3.5%
Other
45.0%
Information Technology and Services
35.7%
Computer Software
28.6%
Marketing and Advertising
10.7%
Retail
7.1%
Consulting
3.6%
Other
14.3%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is the agenda for the coming quarter, what new features will be introduced?
2 Comments
PC
Planned features for Scylla Open Source 4.x and 5.x
• Enhancements to our DynamoDB compatible API (Alternator)
• Faster resumable streaming (Repair base...Read more
ScyllaDB has no more discussions with answers
Supabase has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
