When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found iGrafx easier to use, set up, and do business with overall. However, reviewers preferred the ease of administration with SAP Signavio.
Reviewers felt that iGrafx meets the needs of their business better than SAP Signavio.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that iGrafx is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of SAP Signavio over iGrafx.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
SAP Signavio
No pricing available
iGrafx
iGrafx Platform
On Demand
Increase transparency and improve onboarding by bringing siloed process knowledge out of minds of your staff and making it easily reusable to your entire organization.
SAP Signavio is not available as an Open Source in any form anymore, and transitioned to a proprietary model for reasons such as ensuring business...Read more
What is SAP Signavio used for?
1 Comment
EC
Organizations have the ability not only to comprehend their current business procedures but also to actively oversee, enhance, and transform these processes...Read more
What can Signavio do?
1 Comment
EC
SAP Signavio allows achieving fast insights to action at scale. As time to insight and time to adapt are key to becoming an intelligent enterprise,...Read more
How do you overlay a journey skin once the taxonomy is set up?
2 Comments
RT
Good Afternoon Larry
I would like to get a better understanding of what you are trying to accomplish. If you could open a support request at:...Read more
How different is IGrafx Flowcharter and IGrafx Six Sigma ? Key benefits
1 Comment
Official Response from iGrafx
The difference between Flowcharter and PfSS is simulation. Flowcharter will allow you to build out your models and capture all the relevant data about each...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.