Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare SAP Ariba and Zycus Source-to-Pay 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
LogicGate Risk Cloud
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Precoro
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
AuditBoard
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (57.6% of reviews)
Enterprise (41.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
SAP Ariba
Star Rating
(704)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (57.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about SAP AribaZycus Source-to-Pay
Star Rating
(13)3.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (41.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Zycus Source-to-PaySummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that SAP Ariba excels in contract management features, particularly with its "Approval Process" rated at 8.6, which reviewers mention streamlines the workflow significantly compared to Zycus Source-to-Pay, which has a lower rating of 8.3 in the same area.
- Reviewers mention that SAP Ariba's "Contract Database" feature, rated at 8.6, provides a robust repository for managing contracts, while Zycus Source-to-Pay's similar feature is rated lower at 8.3, indicating a potential gap in functionality.
- G2 users highlight SAP Ariba's superior "Ease of Use" with a score of 8.0, which reviewers say makes it more intuitive for everyday users compared to Zycus Source-to-Pay's score of 7.1, suggesting a steeper learning curve for the latter.
- Users on G2 report that SAP Ariba's "Notifications & Reminders" feature, rated at 8.6, is particularly effective in keeping teams informed, whereas Zycus Source-to-Pay's similar feature is rated at 8.5, indicating a slight edge for SAP Ariba in user engagement.
- Reviewers mention that SAP Ariba's "Data Management" capabilities, especially in "Consolidation" and "Classification" with scores of 8.8 and 8.5 respectively, are more advanced than those of Zycus Source-to-Pay, which may impact users' ability to manage large datasets effectively.
- Users say that SAP Ariba's "Invoice Processing" features, particularly "Match Invoices" rated at 8.7, are more reliable and efficient compared to Zycus Source-to-Pay's score of 8.2, which could lead to discrepancies in financial operations.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
SAP Ariba
No pricing availableZycus Source-to-Pay
No pricing availableFree Trial
SAP Ariba
No trial information availableZycus Source-to-Pay
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.3
504
7.3
11
Ease of Use
7.9
527
7.1
11
Ease of Setup
7.6
265
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
7.9
167
Not enough data
Quality of Support
7.8
480
7.1
11
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.1
171
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
8.3
473
7.9
11
Features by Category
Contract Management Platform Features
8.3
128
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.2
122
|
Verified
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.4
128
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.1
118
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.5
126
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.1
131
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.5
128
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.9
114
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.2
127
|
Verified
Not enough data
Generative AI
7.2
24
Not enough data
7.0
24
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Contract Management
6.0
7
Not enough data
Setup
8.5
80
Not enough data
8.4
81
Not enough data
8.3
79
Not enough data
Performance
8.3
77
Not enough data
8.2
76
Not enough data
8.3
74
Not enough data
8.3
83
Not enough data
Payment Cards
8.4
49
Not enough data
8.0
49
Not enough data
8.1
48
Not enough data
Reporting
8.0
53
Not enough data
7.8
54
Not enough data
8.1
54
Not enough data
8.0
53
Not enough data
Payments
8.3
54
Not enough data
8.3
54
Not enough data
7.8
51
Not enough data
7.6
50
Not enough data
Fraud & Risk Management
8.2
53
Not enough data
7.8
47
Not enough data
8.2
50
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Spend Management
6.4
6
Not enough data
Management
8.5
120
Not enough data
8.3
121
Not enough data
8.6
121
Not enough data
Performance
8.4
107
Not enough data
8.3
110
Not enough data
8.3
104
Not enough data
Supplier Information
8.3
119
Not enough data
8.2
114
Not enough data
8.3
116
Not enough data
Planning
8.6
167
Not enough data
8.6
165
Not enough data
8.3
161
Not enough data
8.5
164
Not enough data
Execution
8.3
168
Not enough data
8.6
167
Not enough data
8.6
163
Not enough data
Analytics
8.5
166
Not enough data
8.4
168
Not enough data
8.5
168
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Procure to Pay
6.6
17
Not enough data
Data Management
8.6
88
Not enough data
8.4
88
Not enough data
8.4
87
Not enough data
8.3
85
Not enough data
8.2
86
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Accounts Payable (AP) and Spend Analysis
6.9
6
Not enough data
Analytics
8.5
85
Not enough data
8.3
83
Not enough data
8.4
88
Not enough data
8.1
83
Not enough data
Recovery
8.5
85
Not enough data
8.3
85
Not enough data
AP Data Processing
8.6
85
Not enough data
8.6
83
Not enough data
8.7
83
Not enough data
Invoice Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Invoice Processing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analytics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Risk
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Recovery
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Audit
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Fraud
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AP Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Invoice Generation
8.3
126
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
131
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
125
|
Verified
Not enough data
Invoice Processing
8.6
133
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.1
125
Not enough data
8.3
127
Not enough data
8.5
123
Not enough data
Analytics
8.5
126
Not enough data
8.2
118
Not enough data
8.3
118
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
120
|
Verified
Not enough data
Integration
8.3
133
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
134
Not enough data
8.3
129
Not enough data
8.3
119
|
Verified
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Invoice Management
6.5
9
Not enough data
6.7
9
Not enough data
6.1
9
Not enough data
Management
8.4
155
Not enough data
8.3
156
Not enough data
8.4
155
Not enough data
8.4
154
Not enough data
Planning
8.5
147
Not enough data
8.4
144
Not enough data
8.2
148
Not enough data
8.4
150
Not enough data
Invoice Management
8.2
141
Not enough data
8.3
147
Not enough data
8.3
144
Not enough data
Supplier Management
8.3
149
Not enough data
8.3
148
Not enough data
7.8
133
Not enough data
Execution
8.3
155
Not enough data
8.8
158
Not enough data
8.4
145
Not enough data
Invoice Processing
8.1
133
Not enough data
8.2
132
Not enough data
8.2
138
Not enough data
8.1
122
Not enough data
8.2
127
Not enough data
Supplier Information
8.3
140
Not enough data
8.1
136
Not enough data
8.3
142
Not enough data
Analytics
8.5
145
Not enough data
8.4
144
Not enough data
8.2
138
Not enough data
8.4
134
Not enough data
8.4
131
Not enough data
Integration
8.4
128
Not enough data
8.3
129
Not enough data
8.4
135
Not enough data
8.7
144
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Purchasing
6.3
5
Not enough data
6.3
5
Not enough data
Contract Creation & Management
8.7
74
Not enough data
8.6
74
Not enough data
8.7
74
Not enough data
8.4
74
Not enough data
Collaboration
8.6
69
Not enough data
8.6
75
Not enough data
Other Platform Features
8.6
74
Not enough data
8.6
71
Not enough data
8.1
72
Not enough data
8.2
71
Not enough data
8.3
74
Not enough data
Contract Data
8.5
72
Not enough data
8.1
69
Not enough data
Generative AI
7.4
15
Not enough data
7.1
15
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Risk Assessment
8.3
10
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
Risk Control
8.5
10
Not enough data
8.3
10
Not enough data
8.7
10
Not enough data
Monitoring
8.2
10
Not enough data
7.2
10
Not enough data
7.8
10
Not enough data
Reporting
8.7
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Third Party & Supplier Risk Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Supplier Marketplace
7.8
34
Not enough data
8.3
34
Not enough data
8.5
35
Not enough data
Contract Management
7.9
33
Not enough data
8.1
34
Not enough data
8.2
32
Not enough data
Data Collection
8.3
33
Not enough data
7.9
34
Not enough data
8.4
32
Not enough data
Project Management
8.3
34
Not enough data
8.4
34
Not enough data
8.4
34
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Strategic Sourcing
5.7
5
Not enough data
6.0
5
Not enough data
5.3
5
Not enough data
Data management - Catalog Management
8.5
8
Not enough data
8.1
8
Not enough data
7.5
8
Not enough data
7.5
8
Not enough data
Product catalogs - Catalog Management
7.7
8
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
7.7
8
Not enough data
Integration - Catalog Management
7.9
8
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
Analytics and Reporting - Catalog Management
7.9
8
Not enough data
7.7
8
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Catalog Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Accounting & Finance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
SAP Ariba and Zycus Source-to-Pay are categorized as Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM), Accounts Payable (AP) and Spend Analysis, Procure to Pay, Spend Management, Supplier Relationship Management (SRM), Invoice Management, Strategic Sourcing, Purchasing, Contract Management, and Catalog Management
Unique Categories
SAP Ariba is categorized as Third Party & Supplier Risk Management
Zycus Source-to-Pay is categorized as AP Automation
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
SAP Ariba
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Zycus Source-to-Pay
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
10.5%
Oil & Energy
5.9%
Accounting
5.8%
Pharmaceuticals
4.1%
Computer Software
3.8%
Other
70.0%
Financial Services
16.7%
Consumer Goods
16.7%
Telecommunications
8.3%
Semiconductors
8.3%
Pharmaceuticals
8.3%
Other
41.7%
Discussions
What is SAP Ariba used for?
3 Comments
NS
Hi there,
Ariba is mainly a procurement solution that is useful for supplier Contracts. If you are looking for a CLM solution that takes care of all...Read more
Zycus Source-to-Pay has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
