Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Sanity and Softdocs 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Accruent Meridian
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Kontent.ai
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
BoldSign
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (72.8% of reviews)
Mid-Market (73.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
No pricing available
Sanity
Star Rating
(909)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (72.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Free Trial is available
Browse all 3 pricing plansSoftdocs
Star Rating
(24)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (73.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about SoftdocsSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Sanity excels in content authoring with a score of 9.1, allowing for a seamless creation process, while Softdocs Etrieve, although strong, scores slightly lower at 8.3, indicating a less robust authoring experience.
- Reviewers mention that Softdocs Etrieve shines in quality of support, achieving a high score of 9.8, which users appreciate for its responsiveness and helpfulness, compared to Sanity's score of 8.9.
- G2 users highlight Sanity's superior custom fields functionality, scoring 9.5, which allows for extensive customization, whereas Softdocs Etrieve's score of 8.0 suggests it may not offer the same level of flexibility.
- Users on G2 report that Softdocs Etrieve has a more efficient records management system, scoring 9.0, which is crucial for organizations needing to manage large volumes of documents, while Sanity's score of 8.0 indicates room for improvement.
- Reviewers say that Sanity's web interface is highly rated at 9.0, providing an intuitive user experience, while Softdocs Etrieve's interface, scoring 6.6, is noted as less user-friendly, which can hinder productivity.
- Users mention that Sanity's mobile capabilities are lacking, with a score of 6.6, which can be a drawback for teams needing to work on-the-go, while Softdocs Etrieve offers a more robust mobile experience, enhancing accessibility.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Sanity
Free forever
Free
For individuals experimenting or shipping smaller projects.
- 20 user seats included
- 2 datasets (public)
- Unlimited content types and locales
Softdocs
No pricing availableFree Trial
Sanity
Free Trial is available
Softdocs
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.0
705
9.5
14
Ease of Use
8.6
718
9.0
15
Ease of Setup
8.7
571
8.5
10
Ease of Admin
9.0
547
9.1
9
Quality of Support
8.9
563
9.8
14
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.2
485
9.8
9
Product Direction (% positive)
9.4
632
9.1
13
Features by Category
Signature Process
Not enough data
8.1
6
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.4
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.3
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - E-Signature
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security and Scalability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
8.3
5
Content
9.1
314
Not enough data
8.8
310
Not enough data
8.7
293
Not enough data
7.9
278
Not enough data
8.2
264
Not enough data
8.3
255
Not enough data
8.3
288
Not enough data
8.2
278
Not enough data
8.7
289
Not enough data
Design
7.1
242
Not enough data
7.7
237
Not enough data
7.9
241
Not enough data
9.1
283
Not enough data
Platform
8.5
274
Not enough data
8.5
258
Not enough data
8.8
277
Not enough data
8.5
279
Not enough data
8.6
253
Not enough data
8.0
237
Not enough data
7.6
241
Not enough data
8.9
280
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Web Content Management
9.7
5
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
Analytics
7.0
35
Not enough data
6.3
33
Not enough data
6.1
30
Not enough data
6.4
37
Not enough data
8.9
40
Not enough data
7.4
31
Not enough data
Content Management
8.7
46
Not enough data
8.4
54
Not enough data
8.6
43
Not enough data
Design & Development
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.8
48
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Digital Experience Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Edit
Not enough data
7.0
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Logistics
Not enough data
9.7
5
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
9.4
6
Setup
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
9.1
9
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
9.2
8
Management
Not enough data
8.3
7
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.6
7
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Workflow Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
9.5
36
Not enough data
8.8
33
Not enough data
9.1
35
Not enough data
Management
9.2
34
Not enough data
7.7
30
Not enough data
8.9
34
Not enough data
Support
7.8
37
Not enough data
8.2
34
Not enough data
8.7
29
Not enough data
Publishing
8.6
355
Not enough data
8.1
317
Not enough data
5.7
219
Not enough data
Development
8.4
434
Not enough data
8.7
405
Not enough data
8.0
360
Not enough data
7.3
321
Not enough data
Analytics
8.1
345
Not enough data
8.2
366
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Headless CMS
9.7
5
Not enough data
Customization
Not enough data
9.5
7
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
9.4
6
Additional Functionality
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.3
7
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Enterprise Content Management (ECM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
File Management
8.5
48
Not enough data
8.5
48
Not enough data
6.3
36
Not enough data
8.6
45
Feature Not Available
9.0
49
Not enough data
8.2
44
Not enough data
7.7
43
8.3
5
7.7
41
Not enough data
7.0
40
Not enough data
7.9
47
Not enough data
9.0
47
Not enough data
6.7
41
Not enough data
Workflow
7.9
44
8.7
5
8.1
44
Not enough data
7.9
39
Not enough data
8.0
40
9.0
5
8.0
37
Feature Not Available
Platform
8.1
41
Not enough data
8.7
46
Not enough data
7.9
40
Not enough data
7.4
39
Not enough data
8.9
46
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Sanity and Softdocs are categorized as Enterprise Content Management (ECM)
Unique Categories
Sanity is categorized as WebOps Platforms, Digital Experience Platforms (DXP), Headless CMS, and Web Content Management
Softdocs is categorized as Document Scanning, Online Form Builder, E-Signature, Document Management, and Workflow Management
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Sanity
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Softdocs
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
20.1%
Information Technology and Services
12.1%
Marketing and Advertising
7.0%
Design
4.6%
Retail
3.1%
Other
53.1%
Higher Education
69.6%
Education Management
26.1%
Primary/Secondary Education
4.3%
‐
‐
Other
0.0%
Discussions
What is sanity IO used for?
4 Comments
CD
We’re using Sanity as our CMS for our international corporate website and sub-sites in several languages, and might also consider using it for our intranet. Read more
What is sanity software?
3 Comments
HM
Sanity is a flexible, highly customizable content platform used to organize your content into categories, create logical relationships between content types,...Read more
Can I expect some changes to the HTTP api to be inegrated to the Sanity JS sdk?
1 Comment
KM
Hi! Our JavaScript client has always supported full CRUD operations against our APIs. You can check out the documentation here:...Read more
Softdocs has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
