Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Samsung Remote Test Lab and Xcode 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Kualitee
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Testiny
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (55.6% of reviews)
Small-Business (54.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Samsung Remote Test Lab
Star Rating
(11)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (55.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Samsung Remote Test LabXcode
Star Rating
(1,004)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (54.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about XcodeSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Xcode excels in its "Emulation" capabilities, receiving a high score of 9.0, which allows developers to effectively test their applications in a simulated environment. In contrast, Samsung Remote Test Lab also offers solid emulation features but scores slightly lower at 8.8, indicating that while it is effective, it may not provide the same level of depth as Xcode.
- Reviewers mention that Xcode's "File Management" system is rated at 8.8, making it easier for developers to organize and manage their project files efficiently. On the other hand, Samsung Remote Test Lab has a slightly lower score of 8.6 in this area, suggesting that while it is functional, it may not be as intuitive or robust as Xcode's file management features.
- G2 users highlight that Xcode's "Customization" options are rated at 8.5, allowing developers to tailor their development environment to their specific needs. Conversely, Samsung Remote Test Lab scores lower at 8.3, indicating that its customization features may be more limited, which could affect user experience for those needing specific configurations.
- Users on G2 report that Xcode's "Help Guides" are rated at 8.6, providing comprehensive support for developers navigating the software. In comparison, Samsung Remote Test Lab's help guides score slightly lower at 8.4, suggesting that while they are helpful, they may not be as detailed or user-friendly as those offered by Xcode.
- Reviewers mention that Xcode's "Test Feedback" feature is rated at 8.9, which is crucial for developers looking to refine their applications based on user input. Samsung Remote Test Lab, while still effective, scores a bit lower at 8.7, indicating that its feedback mechanisms may not be as robust or timely as those in Xcode.
- Users say that Xcode's overall "Ease of Use" is rated at 9.0, making it a preferred choice for many developers, especially those new to the platform. In contrast, Samsung Remote Test Lab, while easier to use than many alternatives, scores 8.8, suggesting that it may require a bit more learning curve for some users.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Samsung Remote Test Lab
No pricing availableXcode
No pricing availableFree Trial
Samsung Remote Test Lab
No trial information availableXcode
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.1
6
8.8
822
Ease of Use
9.2
6
7.8
825
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
8.0
174
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.0
135
Quality of Support
Not enough data
7.7
728
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.1
125
Product Direction (% positive)
8.1
6
7.9
799
Features by Category
Functionality
Not enough data
9.0
65
Not enough data
8.8
63
Not enough data
8.7
57
Not enough data
8.5
63
Not enough data
8.8
63
Not enough data
8.6
61
Not enough data
8.6
61
Functionality
Not enough data
8.7
89
Not enough data
8.5
89
Not enough data
9.0
96
Management
Not enough data
8.3
87
Not enough data
8.6
85
Not enough data
8.8
85
Functionality
Not enough data
8.7
64
Not enough data
8.7
63
Not enough data
8.2
60
Not enough data
8.3
64
Not enough data
8.7
64
Not enough data
8.4
64
Not enough data
8.9
64
Agentic AI - Mobile Development Platforms
Not enough data
8.7
13
Not enough data
8.7
13
Not enough data
8.6
12
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Samsung Remote Test Lab and Xcode are categorized as Mobile App Testing
Unique Categories
Samsung Remote Test Lab has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Samsung Remote Test Lab
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Xcode
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
22.2%
Telecommunications
11.1%
Shipbuilding
11.1%
Program Development
11.1%
Graphic Design
11.1%
Other
33.3%
Computer Software
35.9%
Information Technology and Services
18.1%
Internet
5.7%
Higher Education
3.4%
Financial Services
2.2%
Other
34.7%
Alternatives
Discussions
Samsung Remote Test Lab has no discussions with answers
Can we use Xcode for the hybrid apps in future?
2 Comments
KS
It's doubtful - Apple likes to keep their environment separate from others. iOS will continue to be its own identity and I doubt hybrid apps will be...Read more
Is Xcode good for Python?
2 Comments
YB
no its only for swift there was objective -C also but prefer to go with swift.Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
