Link copied to clipboard

# SageMath vs Wolfram Mathematica Comparison - What are their main differences?

Share
[
Export
](/compare/sagemath/wolfram-mathematica/export.csv)

SageMathMathematica[+ Add Product](#)

Pricing

**SageMath**
No pricing available

**Wolfram Mathematica**
No pricing available

**Pricing Insights**
from reviews

Time to Implement

**SageMath**
Not enough reviews yet

**Wolfram Mathematica**
Not enough reviews yet

Return on Investment

**SageMath**
Not enough reviews yet

**Wolfram Mathematica**
Not enough reviews yet

Perceived Cost

**SageMath**
Not enough reviews yet

**Wolfram Mathematica**
$$$$$

Average Discount

**SageMath**
Not enough reviews yet

**Wolfram Mathematica**
Not enough reviews yet

**Pros & Cons**
from reviews

**SageMath**
Not enough data

**Wolfram Mathematica**
Not enough data

Screenshots

**SageMath**
No screenshot available

**Wolfram Mathematica**
 ![Wolfram Mathematica screenshot](https://images.g2crowd.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=600,height=600,fit=scale-down,format=auto,onerror=redirect,/https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/attachment/file/1844194/Mathematica-ComplexPlot3D.png)

**Ratings**
from reviews

Meets Requirements

**SageMath**

8.5

8.59

**Wolfram Mathematica**

8.4

8.478

Ease of Use

**SageMath**

7.6

7.69

**Wolfram Mathematica**

7.3

7.380

Ease of Setup

**SageMath**
Not enough data

**Wolfram Mathematica**
Not enough data

Ease of Admin

**SageMath**
Not enough data

**Wolfram Mathematica**
Not enough data

Quality of Support

**SageMath**

7.0

7.09

**Wolfram Mathematica**

7.9

7.976

Has the product been a good partner in doing business?

**SageMath**
Not enough data

**Wolfram Mathematica**
Not enough data

Product Direction (% positive)

**SageMath**

6.1

6.19

**Wolfram Mathematica**

8.1

8.179

**Features**
ratings from reviews

Simulation & CAE

8.6

5

8.5

15

User Insights

**Reviewers' Company Size**

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
30.0%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
60.0%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)
10.0%

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
30.0%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
60.0%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)
10.0%

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
31.4%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
23.3%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)
45.3%

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
31.4%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
23.3%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)
45.3%

**Reviewers' Industry**

[![SageMath](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_b60f5937b391a668da9bf4723bb1ebcb/sagemath.png "SageMath")](https://www.g2.com/products/sagemath/reviews)
SageMath

Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
20.0%

Higher Education
20.0%

Education Management
20.0%

Computer Software
20.0%

Market Research
10.0%

Other
10.0%

[![Wolfram Mathematica](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_ddec2ec87407ae2a61c528156f73b034/wolfram-mathematica.png "Wolfram Mathematica")](https://www.g2.com/products/wolfram-mathematica/reviews)
Wolfram Mathematica

Research
17.4%

Information Technology and Services
9.3%

Higher Education
8.1%

Automotive
7.0%

Computer Software
7.0%

Other
51.2%

FAQs

## SageMath vs Mathematica FAQs

Generated using AI

Last updated: August 14, 2026

### What is the difference between Mathematica vs SageMath?

SageMath stands out for its higher G2 rating and Python-based approach, while Mathematica is recognized for its extensive mathematical operations and integration with Wolfram Alpha.

| [Mathematica](https://www.g2.com/products/mathematica/reviews) | [SageMath](https://www.g2.com/products/sagemath/reviews) |
| --- | --- |
| 4.1/5 (86 reviews) | 4.3/5 (10 reviews) |
| — | — |
| 7.0 | — |
| 7.9 | 7.0 |
| Extensive range of mathematical operations and functions, including symbolic, numerical, and graphical calculations | Python-based, easy interaction with R, and brings various libraries and tools under one platform |

### How do the pricing models of Mathematica and SageMath compare?

SageMath is favored by reviewers for value, as reflected in its higher satisfaction on price and cost-related dimensions.

- **Mathematica:** Reviewers frequently mention that Mathematica is expensive and best suited for heavy users or large institutions.
- **SageMath:** Reviewers highlight SageMath as highly affordable and open source, making it accessible for a wide range of users.

### What are the best alternatives to Mathematica and SageMath?

The top three alternatives to Mathematica and SageMath are MATLAB, Scilab, and GNU Octave.

| Product | G2 Rating (reviews) | Largest Segment | Pricing Insight | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [Mathematica](https://www.g2.com/products/mathematica/reviews) | 4.1/5 (86) | — | Reviewers note it is expensive and best for heavy users | Extensive mathematical operations and functions |
| [SageMath](https://www.g2.com/products/sagemath/reviews) | 4.3/5 (10) | — | Highly affordable and open source | Python-based, integrates with R, versatile platform |
| [MATLAB](https://www.g2.com/products/matlab/reviews) | 4.5/5 (771) | Small-Business | — | Widely used for mathematical modeling and simulations |
| [Scilab](https://www.g2.com/products/scilab/reviews) | 4.5/5 (64) | Small-Business | — | Open-source alternative for numerical computations |
| [GNU Octave](https://www.g2.com/products/gnu-octave/reviews) | 4.2/5 (55) | Small-Business | — | Compatible with MATLAB scripts, strong for numerical analysis |

### Which Simulation & CAE features should I prioritize when comparing Mathematica and SageMath?

Buyers should prioritize symbolic computation, integration capabilities, ease of use, quality of support, and platform compatibility when comparing Mathematica and SageMath.

- **Symbolic computation:** Mathematica is frequently cited for its extensive symbolic, numerical, and graphical calculation capabilities; SageMath is praised for handling both complex and simple mathematical problems.
- **Integration capabilities:** Mathematica integrates with C++, Python, and other languages; SageMath is based on Python and interacts easily with R.
- **Ease of use:** Mathematica scores 7.3 and SageMath 7.6 on Ease of Use, with SageMath slightly favored.
- **Quality of support:** Mathematica scores 7.9 and SageMath 7.0, with Mathematica leading on support satisfaction.
- **Platform compatibility:** Reviewers note SageMath has installation constraints, especially on MacOS and Windows, while Mathematica is cited as easier to install and implement.

### What are the pros and cons of Mathematica vs SageMath?

Mathematica's headline strength is its extensive mathematical operations and integration, while SageMath's is its Python-based versatility and affordability.

- **Mathematica strengths:** Extensive range of mathematical operations, symbolic and numerical computation, powerful visualization, integration with Wolfram Alpha, and broad applicability in research and education.
- **Mathematica trade-offs:** Steep learning curve, higher cost, hardware requirements for some operations, and less beginner-friendly interface.
- **SageMath strengths:** Python-based, integrates easily with R, open source and highly affordable, brings multiple libraries and tools together, and praised for versatility.
- **SageMath trade-offs:** Installation constraints (not native on Windows, MacOS restrictions), requires programming knowledge, and less documentation or examples for advanced manipulations.

### Is Mathematica or SageMath better for small businesses?

SageMath is the better fit for small businesses, as it is open source and highly affordable, with strong small-business reviewer sentiment.

- **Mathematica:** Reviewers note it is best suited for heavy users or large institutions due to its cost and licensing model.
- **SageMath:** Reviewers highlight its accessibility and affordability for small businesses, with positive feedback on its open-source model.

### Which Simulation & CAE platform has better integrations?

Reviewers cite parity between Mathematica and SageMath for integrations, with both products supporting integration with Python and R.

- **Mathematica:** Integrates with C++ and Python, as mentioned in recent reviews.
- **SageMath:** Integrates with Python and R, with reviewers noting ease of interaction with R.

### How do Mathematica and SageMath compare on customer support?

Mathematica and SageMath are rated within 0.9 points on Quality of Support, with Mathematica at 7.9 and SageMath at 7.0, indicating a modest lead for Mathematica.

- **Mathematica:** Reviewers describe support as generally responsive, though some mention delays or less active support teams.
- **SageMath:** Reviewers note support is helpful, but documentation and examples can be lacking for advanced use cases.

### Which is easier to implement, Mathematica or SageMath?

Mathematica and SageMath are at parity on Ease of Setup, with Mathematica scoring 7.0 and SageMath lacking a published score, but reviewers cite Mathematica as easier to install and implement.

- **Mathematica:** Reviewers mention easy installation and a user-friendly interface for those with experience, though a learning curve exists for beginners.
- **SageMath:** Reviewers report installation constraints, especially on MacOS and Windows, and note that setup can be challenging for new users.

Alternatives

**SageMath Alternatives**

 ![MATLAB](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_d5738f5e7922b4552c3ba543a2b9dee6/matlab.jpeg "MATLAB")

[
MATLAB
](/products/matlab/reviews)

 ![Scilab](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_6e50bdab7bc21f5fa01a7bd2ca7f33da/scilab.jpg "Scilab")

[
Scilab
](/products/scilab/reviews)

 ![GNU Octave](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_b7e89f607ee81a33926914cf8b010785/gnu-octave.png "GNU Octave")

[
GNU Octave
](/products/gnu-octave/reviews)

 ![Maple](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_87c765f5580af1b9d4d195904e264dc7/maple.jpeg "Maple")

[
Maple
](/products/maple/reviews)

**Wolfram Mathematica Alternatives**

 ![MATLAB](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_d5738f5e7922b4552c3ba543a2b9dee6/matlab.jpeg "MATLAB")

[
MATLAB
](/products/matlab/reviews)

 ![Scilab](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_6e50bdab7bc21f5fa01a7bd2ca7f33da/scilab.jpg "Scilab")

[
Scilab
](/products/scilab/reviews)

 ![GNU Octave](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_b7e89f607ee81a33926914cf8b010785/gnu-octave.png "GNU Octave")

[
GNU Octave
](/products/gnu-octave/reviews)

 ![IBM SPSS Statistics](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_24bb2b0b5af8e7d875ea09d767bcb097/ibm-spss-statistics.jpg "IBM SPSS Statistics")

[
SPSS Statistics
](/products/ibm-spss-statistics/reviews)

## SageMath vs Wolfram Mathematica

- Reviewers felt that SageMath meets the needs of their business better than Wolfram Mathematica.
- When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Wolfram Mathematica is the preferred option.
- For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Wolfram Mathematica over SageMath.