Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Ruby on Rails and Windows Communication Foundation 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (69.0% of reviews)
Enterprise (50.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Ruby on Rails
Star Rating
(81)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (69.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Ruby on RailsWindows Communication Foundation
Star Rating
(13)3.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (50.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Windows Communication FoundationSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Ruby on Rails excels in ease of use with a score of 8.9, making it a preferred choice for small businesses looking for a straightforward development framework. In contrast, Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) has a lower ease of use rating of 8.2, which some users find challenging, especially for those new to the platform.
- Reviewers mention that Ruby on Rails has a strong community support system, reflected in its quality of support rating of 8.4. Users appreciate the wealth of resources and tutorials available, while WCF's support rating of 7.7 indicates that users sometimes struggle to find adequate help when needed.
- G2 users highlight Ruby on Rails' rapid development capabilities, particularly with features like scaffolding and built-in testing tools, which streamline the development process. Conversely, users on G2 report that WCF, while powerful for building service-oriented applications, can be cumbersome due to its complexity and steep learning curve.
- Reviewers say that Ruby on Rails has a positive product direction with an 8.4 rating, indicating that users feel confident in the framework's ongoing development and updates. In comparison, WCF's product direction rating of 7.7 suggests some uncertainty among users regarding its future enhancements and support.
- Users say that Ruby on Rails is particularly well-suited for startups and small businesses, with 68.6% of reviews coming from this segment, highlighting its accessibility and cost-effectiveness. On the other hand, WCF is favored by enterprises, as evidenced by 50% of its reviews, which may indicate a more complex setup and higher resource requirements.
- Users report that Ruby on Rails offers a smoother setup experience with a score of 8.6, making it easier for teams to get started quickly. In contrast, WCF's setup score of 8.3 suggests that while it is functional, users may encounter more hurdles during the initial configuration process.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Ruby on Rails
No pricing availableWindows Communication Foundation
No pricing availableFree Trial
Ruby on Rails
No trial information availableWindows Communication Foundation
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.7
67
9.0
10
Ease of Use
8.9
68
8.2
10
Ease of Setup
8.6
30
8.3
5
Ease of Admin
8.6
28
8.0
5
Quality of Support
8.4
60
7.7
10
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.7
23
8.3
5
Product Direction (% positive)
8.4
67
7.7
10
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Ruby on Rails and Windows Communication Foundation are categorized as Other Web Frameworks
Unique Categories
Ruby on Rails has no unique categories
Windows Communication Foundation has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Ruby on Rails
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Windows Communication Foundation
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
25.4%
Information Technology and Services
23.9%
Internet
9.9%
Telecommunications
4.2%
Program Development
4.2%
Other
32.4%
Information Technology and Services
16.7%
Wireless
8.3%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
8.3%
Tobacco
8.3%
Military
8.3%
Other
50.0%
Discussions
Is Ruby on Rails front end?
1 Comment
RR
Rails can be used as a front end application. Views (written as HTML with embeddable Ruby code) are a primary component of the framework. Read more
Ruby on Rails has no more discussions with answers
Windows Communication Foundation has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
