Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Ruby on Rails and handlebars 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (69.0% of reviews)
Small-Business (54.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Ruby on Rails
Star Rating
(81)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (69.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Ruby on Railshandlebars
Star Rating
(12)3.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (54.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about handlebarsSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Reviewers mention that Ruby on Rails excels in its ease of use, scoring 8.9, which users attribute to its convention over configuration approach, making it easier for developers to get started quickly compared to Handlebars, which scored 8.5.
- Users report that Ruby on Rails has a more robust support system, with a quality of support rating of 8.4, while Handlebars falls short at 6.1, leading to frustrations for users seeking timely assistance.
- G2 users highlight that Ruby on Rails has a higher total number of reviews (70) compared to Handlebars (11), indicating a larger user base and more community feedback, which can be beneficial for new users looking for resources and shared experiences.
- Users on G2 mention that Ruby on Rails has a better product direction, with a positive rating of 8.4, suggesting that the platform is continuously evolving and improving, while Handlebars' lower score of 6.1 raises concerns about its future development.
- Reviewers say that Ruby on Rails is particularly strong in meeting requirements, scoring 8.7, which users attribute to its extensive libraries and plugins that enhance functionality, whereas Handlebars, with a score of 8.3, may not meet all user needs as effectively.
- Users report that the ease of setup for Ruby on Rails is rated at 8.6, making it a favorable choice for developers looking to deploy applications quickly, while Handlebars lacks specific ratings in this area, leaving potential users uncertain about its setup process.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Ruby on Rails
No pricing availablehandlebars
No pricing availableFree Trial
Ruby on Rails
No trial information availablehandlebars
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.7
67
8.3
9
Ease of Use
8.9
68
8.5
9
Ease of Setup
8.6
30
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
8.6
28
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.4
60
6.1
6
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.7
23
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
8.4
67
6.1
9
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Ruby on Rails and handlebars are categorized as Other Web Frameworks
Unique Categories
Ruby on Rails has no unique categories
handlebars has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Ruby on Rails
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
handlebars
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
25.4%
Information Technology and Services
23.9%
Internet
9.9%
Telecommunications
4.2%
Program Development
4.2%
Other
32.4%
Computer Software
27.3%
Education Management
18.2%
Marketing and Advertising
9.1%
Internet
9.1%
Information Technology and Services
9.1%
Other
27.3%
Discussions
Is Ruby on Rails front end?
1 Comment
RR
Rails can be used as a front end application. Views (written as HTML with embeddable Ruby code) are a primary component of the framework. Read more
Ruby on Rails has no more discussions with answers
handlebars has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
