Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Roslyn and Veracode Application Security Platform 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Endor Labs
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Intruder
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CAST Highlight
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (54.5% of reviews)
Enterprise (52.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Roslyn
Star Rating
(12)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (54.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about RoslynVeracode Application Security Platform
Star Rating
(25)3.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (52.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Veracode Application Security PlatformSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that the Veracode Application Security Platform excels in Static Code Analysis with a score of 9.3, indicating a robust capability to identify vulnerabilities in code before deployment. In contrast, Roslyn also offers strong analysis features but falls slightly behind with a score of 8.6, suggesting it may not be as comprehensive in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Roslyn shines in Ease of Use with a score of 8.5, making it more user-friendly for teams new to application security. On the other hand, Veracode has a lower score of 7.3, which may indicate a steeper learning curve for new users.
- G2 users highlight that Veracode has a strong Quality of Support with a score of 8.0, providing timely assistance and resources. In comparison, Roslyn outperforms with a score of 9.4, suggesting that users may find more responsive and helpful support when issues arise.
- Users on G2 report that Roslyn offers superior Reporting and Analytics capabilities, scoring 8.3, which helps teams better understand their security posture. Veracode matches this score but lacks some of the advanced analytics features that users desire.
- Reviewers mention that Veracode has a higher Detection Rate at 8.0, which is crucial for identifying potential threats effectively. However, Roslyn has a slightly lower score of 7.8, indicating it may miss some vulnerabilities that Veracode could catch.
- Users say that Roslyn provides excellent Extensibility with a score of 9.2, allowing for seamless integration with other tools and workflows. In contrast, Veracode has a lower score in this area, which may limit its adaptability in diverse development environments.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Roslyn
No pricing availableVeracode Application Security Platform
No pricing availableFree Trial
Roslyn
No trial information availableVeracode Application Security Platform
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.4
8
8.1
19
Ease of Use
8.5
8
7.3
19
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
5.7
7
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
7.4
7
Quality of Support
9.4
8
8.0
18
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
7.9
7
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
8
6.3
19
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)Hide 14 FeaturesShow 14 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
7.9
7
Not enough data
9.2
6
Analysis
Not enough data
8.3
7
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
9.3
7
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
8.6
6
Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
7.8
6
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Network
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Application
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Vulnerability Scanner
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Documentation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Code Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)Hide 1 FeatureShow 1 Feature
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Roslyn and Veracode Application Security Platform are categorized as Static Code Analysis
Unique Categories
Roslyn has no unique categories
Veracode Application Security Platform is categorized as AI AppSec Assistants, Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Penetration Testing, Vulnerability Scanner, Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), Secure Code Review, Software Composition Analysis, and Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Roslyn
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Veracode Application Security Platform
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
18.2%
Automotive
18.2%
Sports
9.1%
Printing
9.1%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
9.1%
Other
36.4%
Information Technology and Services
30.4%
Hospital & Health Care
13.0%
Consumer Goods
8.7%
Computer Software
8.7%
Telecommunications
4.3%
Other
34.8%
Discussions
What makes Roslyn different from other similar coding applications?
1 Comment
BC
USPRead more
Roslyn has no more discussions with answers
Veracode Application Security Platform has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
