# RoadEng Civil Engineer vs Site3D Comparison

---
## Frequently Asked Questions

### What is the difference between RoadEng vs Site3D?

RoadEng stands out for its higher G2 rating and top-cited strength in handling large survey data and fast design, while Site3D is praised for its ease of use and quick engineering drawing generation.

| [RoadEng](https://www.g2.com/products/roadeng-civil-engineer/reviews) | [Site3D](https://www.g2.com/products/site3d/reviews) |
| --- | --- |
| 4.6/5 (17 reviews) | 4.5/5 (36 reviews) |
| — | — |
| — | 8.8 |
| 9.5 | 9.1 |
| Handles large survey data and enables fast concept-to-design workflows | Quick engineering drawing generation and easy management of multiple project documents |



### How do the pricing models of RoadEng and Site3D compare?

RoadEng is rated higher for value, with reviewers expressing strong satisfaction with its cost-effectiveness compared to Site3D.

- **RoadEng:** Reviewers consistently highlight RoadEng as cost-effective and a strong value for the features provided.
- **Site3D:** Reviewers note Site3D's flexible payment structure and keen price point as beneficial, especially for small practices.



### What are the best alternatives to RoadEng and Site3D?

The top three alternatives to RoadEng and Site3D are Civil 3D, MicroStation, and GeoHECRAS.

| Product | G2 Rating (reviews) | Largest Segment | Pricing Insight | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [RoadEng](https://www.g2.com/products/roadeng-civil-engineer/reviews) | 4.6/5 (17 reviews) | — | Reviewers highlight cost-effectiveness | Handles large survey data and enables fast concept-to-design workflows |
| [Site3D](https://www.g2.com/products/site3d/reviews) | 4.5/5 (36 reviews) | — | Flexible payment structure and keen price point | Quick engineering drawing generation and easy management of multiple project documents |
| [Civil 3D](https://www.g2.com/products/civil-3d/reviews) | 4.4/5 (305 reviews) | Mid-Market | — | Comprehensive civil engineering design capabilities |
| [MicroStation](https://www.g2.com/products/microstation/reviews) | 4.0/5 (416 reviews) | Small-Business | — | Robust drafting and modeling tools |
| [GeoHECRAS](https://www.g2.com/products/geohecras/reviews) | 4.7/5 (354 reviews) | Small-Business | — | Advanced hydraulic modeling and analysis |



### Which Civil Engineering Design features should I prioritize when comparing RoadEng and Site3D?

Buyers should prioritize Drawing, Ease of Use, Quality of Support, 3D Rendering, and Integration capabilities when comparing RoadEng and Site3D.

- **Drawing:** Both products are frequently cited for drawing capabilities, with Drawing as the most mentioned feature in reviews.
- **Ease of Use:** RoadEng scores 9.1, Site3D scores 9.2.
- **Quality of Support:** RoadEng scores 9.5, Site3D scores 9.1.
- **3D Rendering:** RoadEng offers 3D Rendering, which is not listed for Site3D.
- **Integration capabilities:** Site3D reviewers mention integration with AutoCAD and MicroDrainage; RoadEng reviewers mention file compatibility with DWG, DGN, and other formats.



### What are the pros and cons of RoadEng vs Site3D?

RoadEng's headline strength is handling large survey data and fast design, while Site3D excels in quick engineering drawing generation and ease of use.

- **RoadEng strengths:** Handles large survey data, enables fast concept-to-design workflows, cost-effective, easy to use, strong support staff, and efficient for road and highway design.
- **RoadEng trade-offs:** Some reviewers note limitations in file compatibility with third-party packages and the ability to manage only one corridor per file.
- **Site3D strengths:** Quick engineering drawing generation, easy management of multiple project documents, intuitive interface, flexible payment structure, and strong integration with AutoCAD and MicroDrainage.
- **Site3D trade-offs:** Occasional software crashes, some visualization and 3D effects could be improved, and certain features like verge specification and drainage tool updates are requested by reviewers.



### Is RoadEng or Site3D better for small businesses?

Site3D is better suited for small businesses, with reviewers frequently citing its flexible payment structure and ease of use for smaller practices.

- **RoadEng:** Reviewers highlight its cost-effectiveness and ease of use, but do not specifically emphasize small-business fit.
- **Site3D:** Reviewers from small practices praise its flexible payment options and suitability for firms where price is a key consideration.



### Which Civil Engineering Design platform has better integrations?

Site3D is favored for integrations, with reviewers frequently mentioning its compatibility with AutoCAD and MicroDrainage.

- **RoadEng:** Reviewers mention file compatibility with DWG, DGN, and other formats, enabling work with other design programs.
- **Site3D:** Reviewers highlight integration with AutoCAD and MicroDrainage, making it easy to transfer drawings and drainage designs between platforms.



### How do RoadEng and Site3D compare on customer support?

RoadEng and Site3D are rated within 0.4 points on Quality of Support, with RoadEng holding a slight edge at 9.5 versus Site3D's 9.1.

- **RoadEng:** Reviewers consistently praise the support staff for being knowledgeable, responsive, and helpful, with several noting that technical support engineers are also software engineers.
- **Site3D:** Reviewers describe support as helpful and fast to respond, with positive experiences in resolving issues and considering feature requests for upcoming builds.



### Which is easier to implement, RoadEng or Site3D?

Site3D is easier to implement, with an Ease of Setup score of 8.8 and multiple reviewers citing quick onboarding and minimal training requirements.

- **RoadEng:** Reviewers describe the software as easy to learn and quick to set up, with several noting that little or no training is needed to get started.
- **Site3D:** Reviewers highlight the friendly interface, easy navigation, and fast initial implementation, with many stating that even novices can become competent designers quickly.



### Which product has better Drawing?

Both RoadEng and Site3D are highly rated for Drawing, with reviewers frequently citing drawing capabilities as a core strength.

- **RoadEng:** Drawing is the most frequently mentioned feature, with reviewers praising automated drawing outputs and the ability to generate full sets of drawings quickly.
- **Site3D:** Drawing is also the most frequently mentioned feature, with reviewers highlighting quick engineering drawing generation and easy transfer of drawings to AutoCAD.



| | RoadEng Civil Engineer | Site3D | 
|---|---|---|
| **Star Rating** | 4.6 out of 5 | 4.5 out of 5 | 
| **Total Reviews** | 17 | 36 | 
| **Largest Market Segment** | Small-Business (41.2% of reviews) | Small-Business (68.6% of reviews) | 
| **Entry Level Price** | Free Trial 1 User With One-Time Purchase | No pricing available | 


---
## Ratings Comparison
| Rating | RoadEng Civil Engineer | Site3D | 
|---|---|---|
  | **Meets Requirements** | 9.1 (15 reviews) | 8.8 (28 reviews) | 
  | **Ease of Use** | 9.1 (16 reviews) | 9.2 (28 reviews) | 
  | **Ease of Setup** | Not enough data | 8.8 (8 reviews) | 
  | **Ease of Admin** | Not enough data | 9.0 (7 reviews) | 
  | **Quality of Support** | 9.5 (16 reviews) | 9.1 (26 reviews) | 
  | **Has the product been a good partner in doing business?** | Not enough data | 9.5 (7 reviews) | 
  | **Product Direction (% positive)** | 10.0 (16 reviews) | 9.6 (28 reviews) | 

---
## Pricing

### RoadEng Civil Engineer

#### Entry-Level Pricing

Plan: Request a Trial

Price: Free Trial 1 User With One-Time Purchase

Key Features:
- Try one of Softree's engineering software products for 21-days.
- No commitments. No credit card information is required. 
- www.softree.com/Trial

[Browse all 4 editions](https://www.g2.com/products/roadeng-civil-engineer/pricing)

#### Free Trial

Yes

### Site3D

#### Entry-Level Pricing

No pricing available

#### Free Trial

Yes

---
## Features Comparison By Category

### Civil Engineering Design

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **RoadEng Civil Engineer** | 9.3/10 | 7 |
| **Site3D** | 9.3/10 | 17 |

#### Plan

| Feature | RoadEng Civil Engineer | Site3D | 
|---|---|---|
| **Documentation ** | 9.4 (6 reviews) | 8.9 (15 reviews) | 
| **Sequence** | 9.4 (6 reviews) | 8.6 (12 reviews) | 
| **Annotate** | 8.6 (6 reviews) | 9.0 (12 reviews) | 
| **Collaborate ** | 9.2 (6 reviews) | 8.8 (13 reviews) | 

#### Design

| Feature | RoadEng Civil Engineer | Site3D | 
|---|---|---|
| **3D Modeling** | 9.4 (6 reviews) | 9.2 (15 reviews) | 
| **3D Rendering ** | 8.9 (6 reviews) | Feature Not Available | 
| **Drawing** | 9.7 (6 reviews) | 9.3 (15 reviews) | 
| **Editing ** | 9.4 (6 reviews) | 9.3 (15 reviews) | 

#### Construction

| Feature | RoadEng Civil Engineer | Site3D | 
|---|---|---|
| **Fabrication** | 9.3 (5 reviews) | Feature Not Available | 
| **Reinforcement** | 9.3 (5 reviews) | Feature Not Available | 
| **Clash Detection** | 9.3 (5 reviews) | 9.5 (14 reviews) | 
| **Grading** | Not enough data | 9.6 (8 reviews) | 
| **Earthwork** | Not enough data | 10.0 (8 reviews) | 

#### Engineering

| Feature | RoadEng Civil Engineer | Site3D | 
|---|---|---|
| **Hydraulic engineering** | 9.3 (5 reviews) | 9.0 (7 reviews) | 
| **Hydrologic engineering** | 9.0 (5 reviews) | 9.5 (7 reviews) | 
| **Transportation engineering** | 9.7 (5 reviews) | 9.6 (9 reviews) | 
| **Structural engineering** | 9.7 (5 reviews) | 9.4 (6 reviews) | 

#### Additional Functionality

| Feature | RoadEng Civil Engineer | Site3D | 
|---|---|---|
| **Mechanical** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Process Control** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Access Controls/Permissions** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Product Data Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Configurable Workflow** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Manufacturing Design Data** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Collaboration Tools** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **3D Imaging** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Data Import/Export** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Civil** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Customizable Fields** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Data Capture and Transfer** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Design Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Version Control** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Presentation Tools** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Configuration Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Document Generation** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Compliance Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Change Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Electrical** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Mechatronics** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Project Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **AI Copilot** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Design Analysis** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **CAD Tools** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Document Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Bills of Material** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Generative AI** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Visual Analytics** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Data Visualization** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **File Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Reporting/Analytics** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Project Templates** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Content Library** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

### Earthworks

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **RoadEng Civil Engineer** | N/A | N/A |
| **Site3D** | N/A | N/A |

#### Operations

| Feature | RoadEng Civil Engineer | Site3D | 
|---|---|---|
| **Earthworks Design** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Earthworks Estimating** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Business Operations** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Project Estimating** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

#### Resource Management

| Feature | RoadEng Civil Engineer | Site3D | 
|---|---|---|
| **Supply Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Field Service Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Contractor Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Workflow Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Document Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Task Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Bid Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

#### Additional Functionality

| Feature | RoadEng Civil Engineer | Site3D | 
|---|---|---|
| **Collaboration Tools** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Multiple Format Support** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Search/Filter** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Quotes/Estimates** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Document Storage** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **For AEC Industry** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Trench Calculator** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Third-Party Integrations** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Job Costing** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Generative AI** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Cost Tracking** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Project Tracking** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **2D Drawing** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Customizable Reports** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Activity Dashboard** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Reporting/Analytics** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Cut & Fill Estimates** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Annotations** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Labor Cost Reporting** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **CAD Tools** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Takeoff** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Cost Database** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **3D Modeling** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **API** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Job Scheduling** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Customizable Templates** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Electronic Plans** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Bill of Materials** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **AI Copilot** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Geographic Maps** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Data Import/Export** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

---
## Categories
**Shared Categories (1):** [Civil Engineering Design Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/civil-engineering-design)

**Unique to RoadEng Civil Engineer (1):** [Earthworks Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/earthworks)



---
## Reviewer Demographics

### By Company Size

| Segment | RoadEng Civil Engineer | Site3D | 
|---|---|---|
| **Small-Business** | 41.2% | 68.6% | 
| **Mid-Market** | 35.3% | 25.7% | 
| **Enterprise** | 23.5% | 5.7% | 

### By Industry

#### RoadEng Civil Engineer

- **Construction:** 29.4%
- **Civil Engineering:** 17.6%
- **Government Administration:** 11.8%
- **Restaurants:** 5.9%
- **Paper & Forest Products:** 5.9%
- **Information Technology and Services:** 5.9%
- **Environmental Services:** 5.9%
- **Design:** 5.9%
- **Computer Software:** 5.9%
- **Architecture & Planning:** 5.9%

#### Site3D

- **Civil Engineering:** 71.4%
- **Construction:** 11.4%
- **Transportation/Trucking/Railroad:** 2.9%
- **Real Estate:** 2.9%
- **Computer Software:** 2.9%
- **Computer Hardware:** 2.9%
- **Architecture & Planning:** 2.9%
- **Animation:** 2.9%

---
## Alternatives

### Alternatives to RoadEng Civil Engineer

- [Civil 3D](https://www.g2.com/products/civil-3d/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (390 reviews)
- [MicroStation](https://www.g2.com/products/microstation/reviews) — 4.0/5 stars (416 reviews)
- [GeoHECRAS](https://www.g2.com/products/geohecras/reviews) — 4.7/5 stars (356 reviews)
- [ZWCAD](https://www.g2.com/products/zwcad/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (354 reviews)
- [OpenRoads Designer](https://www.g2.com/products/openroads-designer/reviews) — 4.1/5 stars (139 reviews)
- [BusyBusy](https://www.g2.com/products/busybusy/reviews) — 4.8/5 stars (159 reviews)
- [GeoHECHMS](https://www.g2.com/products/geohechms/reviews) — 4.7/5 stars (127 reviews)
- [Methvin](https://www.g2.com/products/methvin/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (110 reviews)
- [AutoTURN](https://www.g2.com/products/autoturn/reviews) — 4.3/5 stars (50 reviews)
- [Autodesk InfraWorks](https://www.g2.com/products/autodesk-infraworks/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (42 reviews)

### Alternatives to Site3D

- [Civil 3D](https://www.g2.com/products/civil-3d/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (390 reviews)
- [MicroStation](https://www.g2.com/products/microstation/reviews) — 4.0/5 stars (416 reviews)
- [GeoHECRAS](https://www.g2.com/products/geohecras/reviews) — 4.7/5 stars (356 reviews)
- [Civil Designer](https://www.g2.com/products/civil-designer/reviews) — 4.8/5 stars (18 reviews)
- [ZWCAD](https://www.g2.com/products/zwcad/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (354 reviews)
- [OpenRoads Designer](https://www.g2.com/products/openroads-designer/reviews) — 4.1/5 stars (139 reviews)
- [Carlson Civil](https://www.g2.com/products/carlson-civil/reviews) — 4.3/5 stars (22 reviews)
- [GeoHECHMS](https://www.g2.com/products/geohechms/reviews) — 4.7/5 stars (127 reviews)
- [AutoTURN](https://www.g2.com/products/autoturn/reviews) — 4.3/5 stars (50 reviews)
- [Autodesk InfraWorks](https://www.g2.com/products/autodesk-infraworks/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (42 reviews)

---
## Top Discussions

### RoadEng Civil Engineer

No discussions available for this product.

### Site3D

No discussions available for this product.

---
**Source:** [G2.com](https://www.g2.com) | [Comparison Page](https://www.g2.com/compare/roadeng-civil-engineer-vs-site3d)