Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare ReSharper C++ and Veracode Application Security Platform 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Intruder
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CAST Highlight
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Aikido Security
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (44.4% of reviews)
Enterprise (52.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$139.00 1 User Per Year
No pricing available
ReSharper C++
Star Rating
(18)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (44.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$139.00 1 User Per Year
Browse all 3 pricing plansVeracode Application Security Platform
Star Rating
(25)3.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (52.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Veracode Application Security PlatformSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that the "Ease of Use" for ReSharper C++ is significantly higher at 9.5 compared to Veracode's 7.3, making it a more user-friendly option for developers looking for a seamless experience.
- Reviewers mention that Veracode Application Security Platform excels in "Static Code Analysis" with a score of 9.3, which is crucial for identifying vulnerabilities early in the development process, while ReSharper C++ focuses more on code quality and refactoring.
- G2 users highlight that ReSharper C++ offers superior "Test Automation" capabilities with a score of 9.0, allowing for more efficient testing processes, whereas Veracode's strengths lie in its "Vulnerability Scan" feature, rated at 8.8, which is essential for security-focused applications.
- Users on G2 report that Veracode's "Quality of Support" is rated at 8.0, which is commendable, but still falls short compared to ReSharper C++'s 8.5, indicating that users may find more responsive assistance with ReSharper.
- Reviewers say that Veracode's "Product Direction" score of 6.3 suggests some concerns about its future development, while ReSharper C++ has a more positive outlook with a score of 8.3, indicating a commitment to continuous improvement and feature updates.
- Users report that Veracode's "Reporting and Analytics" feature is rated at 8.3, which is beneficial for tracking security metrics, but ReSharper C++ shines with its "Extensibility" score of 9.2, allowing users to customize their development environment more effectively.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
ReSharper C++
FOR INDIVIDUAL USE
$139.00
1 User Per Year
$ 111 /2nd year and $ 83 /3rd year onwards
- Or pay monthly $ 13.90
- All Products Pack available from $ 289 /1st year
- dotUltimate available from $ 169 /1st year
Veracode Application Security Platform
No pricing availableFree Trial
ReSharper C++
Free Trial is available
Veracode Application Security Platform
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.9
14
8.1
19
Ease of Use
9.5
14
7.3
19
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
5.7
7
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
7.4
7
Quality of Support
8.5
12
8.0
18
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
7.9
7
Product Direction (% positive)
8.3
14
6.3
19
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)Hide 14 FeaturesShow 14 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
7.9
7
Not enough data
9.2
6
Analysis
Not enough data
8.3
7
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
9.3
7
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
8.6
6
Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
7.8
6
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Network
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Application
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Vulnerability Scanner
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Documentation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Code Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)Hide 1 FeatureShow 1 Feature
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
ReSharper C++ and Veracode Application Security Platform are categorized as Static Code Analysis
Unique Categories
ReSharper C++ has no unique categories
Veracode Application Security Platform is categorized as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Penetration Testing, Vulnerability Scanner, Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), Secure Code Review, Software Composition Analysis, and Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
ReSharper C++
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Veracode Application Security Platform
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
33.3%
Information Technology and Services
11.1%
Higher Education
11.1%
Financial Services
11.1%
Staffing and Recruiting
5.6%
Other
27.8%
Information Technology and Services
30.4%
Hospital & Health Care
13.0%
Consumer Goods
8.7%
Computer Software
8.7%
Telecommunications
4.3%
Other
34.8%
Discussions
ReSharper C++ has no discussions with answers
Veracode Application Security Platform has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
