Users report that Redis Cloud excels in integrated caching, achieving a perfect score of 10.0, which significantly enhances application performance, while ScyllaDB's integrated cache performance is rated at 8.0, indicating room for improvement.
Reviewers mention that Redis Cloud's auto sharding feature is highly effective, scoring 9.2, which allows for seamless scaling, whereas ScyllaDB's auto sharding is rated lower at 8.6, suggesting it may not handle scaling as efficiently.
G2 users highlight Redis Cloud's superior data types support with a score of 9.2, making it versatile for various applications, while ScyllaDB's support for data types is rated at 8.3, indicating it may not cater to as many use cases.
Users on G2 report that Redis Cloud has a better ease of setup with a score of 9.1, making it more user-friendly for new users, compared to ScyllaDB's score of 8.2, which suggests a steeper learning curve.
Reviewers say that Redis Cloud's product direction is perceived positively with a score of 6.9, while ScyllaDB shines in this area with a score of 9.2, indicating a stronger commitment to future enhancements and user needs.
Users report that Redis Cloud's quality of support is rated at 8.2, which is slightly lower than ScyllaDB's 8.3, suggesting that ScyllaDB may provide a marginally better support experience for users facing issues.
What is the agenda for the coming quarter, what new features will be introduced?
2 Comments
PC
Planned features for Scylla Open Source 4.x and 5.x
• Enhancements to our DynamoDB compatible API (Alternator)
• Faster resumable streaming (Repair base...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.