Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Red Hat OpenShift and Tanzu 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Sangfor HCI
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (49.1% of reviews)
Mid-Market (42.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Red Hat OpenShift
Star Rating
(303)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (49.1% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Red Hat OpenShiftTanzu
Star Rating
(28)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (42.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about TanzuSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Red Hat OpenShift excels in application deployment with a score of 9.2, while Tanzu's deployment capabilities are not explicitly rated but are generally perceived as slightly less robust, indicating a potential gap in user experience during deployment.
- Reviewers mention that both platforms have strong development tools, but Tanzu's Developer Toolkit scores higher at 9.1 compared to OpenShift's 8.5, suggesting that users may find Tanzu's toolkit more comprehensive and user-friendly.
- G2 users highlight that OpenShift's application performance monitoring is rated at 9.3, which is higher than Tanzu's offerings, indicating that users may benefit from more effective performance insights with OpenShift.
- Users on G2 report that OpenShift has a slight edge in ease of setup with a score of 8.1 compared to Tanzu's 7.8, suggesting that new users may find OpenShift easier to implement initially.
- Reviewers mention that both platforms offer strong orchestration capabilities, but Tanzu scores slightly higher at 9.1 compared to OpenShift's 9.0, indicating that users may prefer Tanzu for more advanced orchestration features.
- Users say that OpenShift's quality of support is rated at 8.4, which is comparable to Tanzu's 8.5, but some users have noted that Tanzu's support is more responsive, which could be a deciding factor for those prioritizing customer service.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Red Hat OpenShift
No pricing availableTanzu
No pricing availableFree Trial
Red Hat OpenShift
No trial information availableTanzu
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.7
83
8.5
27
Ease of Use
8.2
226
8.5
28
Ease of Setup
7.8
193
7.8
13
Ease of Admin
8.6
57
8.5
12
Quality of Support
8.4
73
8.5
27
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.6
53
8.5
12
Product Direction (% positive)
9.0
80
9.1
27
Features by Category
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Server Virtualization
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Alerts management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
Monitoring
9.4
6
Not enough data
9.7
6
Not enough data
9.4
6
Not enough data
9.7
6
Not enough data
Automation
9.2
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
Analysis
8.0
5
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
Issue Resolution
8.6
6
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
Development
9.1
23
Not enough data
8.5
17
Not enough data
9.0
17
Not enough data
9.1
18
Not enough data
9.2
16
Not enough data
Database
8.3
21
Not enough data
8.2
21
Not enough data
8.7
22
Not enough data
8.3
21
Not enough data
8.6
22
Not enough data
Infrastructure
8.6
23
Not enough data
9.0
20
Not enough data
9.2
24
Not enough data
Configuration
Not enough data
9.3
14
Not enough data
9.2
14
Not enough data
9.0
14
Not enough data
8.7
13
Not enough data
9.0
13
Database Administration
Not enough data
9.1
13
Not enough data
9.3
12
Not enough data
9.0
12
Availability
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
9.3
12
Not enough data
9.2
12
Security
Not enough data
8.9
12
Not enough data
8.9
12
Not enough data
8.6
12
Data Management
Not enough data
8.8
12
Not enough data
8.8
12
Management
8.5
32
8.2
17
8.4
31
8.5
16
8.2
30
8.9
16
Organization
8.5
32
8.6
16
8.9
33
9.0
16
9.1
31
9.1
16
Development
8.5
27
9.1
16
8.8
30
8.8
16
8.6
25
8.5
16
9.2
26
9.2
16
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Red Hat OpenShift and Tanzu are categorized as Container Management
Unique Categories
Red Hat OpenShift is categorized as Container Monitoring, Container Orchestration, Cloud Platform as a Service (PaaS), and Server Virtualization
Tanzu is categorized as Container Registry and Database as a Service (DBaaS)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Red Hat OpenShift
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Tanzu
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
15.5%
Financial Services
13.8%
Banking
9.2%
Computer Software
8.5%
Telecommunications
7.1%
Other
45.9%
Information Technology and Services
25.0%
Computer Software
17.9%
Telecommunications
7.1%
Banking
7.1%
Manufacturing
3.6%
Other
39.3%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is included in Red Hat OpenShift container platform?
1 Comment
NG
you can deploy your applications and have UI which is more superior to Kubernetes. operator development, etc.. all features of k8s are present in OCP.Read more
Red Hat OpenShift has no more discussions with answers
Tanzu has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
