Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Red Hat OpenShift and SUSE Storage 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Sangfor HCI
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (49.1% of reviews)
Enterprise (46.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Red Hat OpenShift
Star Rating
(303)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (49.1% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Red Hat OpenShiftSUSE Storage
Star Rating
(13)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (46.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about SUSE StorageSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Red Hat OpenShift excels in its Application Deployment capabilities, scoring a solid 9.2, which reviewers mention makes it a preferred choice for enterprises looking for robust deployment options. In contrast, Longhorn also matches this score but lacks the extensive user reviews that provide insights into its deployment effectiveness.
- Reviewers mention that Longhorn shines in Backup / Recovery features, achieving a score of 9.2, which users on G2 highlight as a critical advantage for data protection. Red Hat OpenShift, while competent with a score of 8.1, does not offer the same level of user satisfaction in this area.
- G2 users indicate that Longhorn's Storage capabilities are superior, with a score of 9.4, which reviewers say provides excellent performance and flexibility. Red Hat OpenShift, with a score of 8.4, is seen as less adaptable in storage management, according to user feedback.
- Users say that Red Hat OpenShift's Development Tools score of 8.3 is solid, but Longhorn's 8.8 rating is noted for offering a more user-friendly experience, particularly in terms of integration with various development environments.
- Reviewers mention that both products have strong Security features, with Red Hat OpenShift and Longhorn both scoring 9.1. However, users report that OpenShift's security protocols are more comprehensive, making it a better fit for enterprises with stringent security requirements.
- Users on G2 highlight that Longhorn's Auto Scaling feature, scoring 8.8, is particularly praised for its efficiency in resource management, while Red Hat OpenShift's score of 8.6 is seen as slightly less effective in dynamic scaling scenarios.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Red Hat OpenShift
No pricing availableSUSE Storage
No pricing availableFree Trial
Red Hat OpenShift
No trial information availableSUSE Storage
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.7
83
8.8
12
Ease of Use
8.2
226
9.0
12
Ease of Setup
7.8
193
8.3
8
Ease of Admin
8.6
57
9.0
8
Quality of Support
8.4
73
8.3
11
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.6
53
9.2
8
Product Direction (% positive)
9.0
80
10.0
12
Features by Category
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Server Virtualization
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Alerts management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
Monitoring
9.4
6
Not enough data
9.7
6
Not enough data
9.4
6
Not enough data
9.7
6
Not enough data
Automation
9.2
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
Analysis
8.0
5
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
Issue Resolution
8.6
6
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
Development
9.1
23
9.2
12
8.5
17
8.8
11
9.0
17
9.0
10
9.1
18
8.3
12
9.2
16
8.6
11
Database
8.3
21
8.1
12
8.2
21
8.5
12
8.7
22
8.8
11
8.3
21
9.2
11
8.6
22
9.4
12
Infrastructure
8.6
23
9.1
11
9.0
20
8.5
11
9.2
24
9.1
11
Management
8.5
32
Not enough data
8.4
31
Not enough data
8.2
30
Not enough data
Organization
8.5
32
Not enough data
8.9
33
Not enough data
9.1
31
Not enough data
Development
8.5
27
Not enough data
8.8
30
Not enough data
8.6
25
Not enough data
9.2
26
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Red Hat OpenShift and SUSE Storage are categorized as Cloud Platform as a Service (PaaS)
Unique Categories
Red Hat OpenShift is categorized as Container Monitoring, Container Orchestration, Container Management, and Server Virtualization
SUSE Storage has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Red Hat OpenShift
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
SUSE Storage
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
15.5%
Financial Services
13.8%
Banking
9.2%
Computer Software
8.5%
Telecommunications
7.1%
Other
45.9%
Information Technology and Services
30.8%
Computer Software
30.8%
Computer & Network Security
15.4%
Retail
7.7%
Automotive
7.7%
Other
7.7%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is included in Red Hat OpenShift container platform?
1 Comment
NG
you can deploy your applications and have UI which is more superior to Kubernetes. operator development, etc.. all features of k8s are present in OCP.Read more
Red Hat OpenShift has no more discussions with answers
SUSE Storage has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
