Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform and Semaphore 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
BackBox
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (48.9% of reviews)
Small-Business (66.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$5,000 per year
Contact Us 0 -
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Star Rating
(373)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (48.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$5,000 per year
Free Trial is available
Browse all 3 pricing plansSemaphore
Star Rating
(191)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (66.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us 0 -
Learn more about SemaphoreSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Semaphore excels in Quality of Support with a score of 9.6, while Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform lags behind at 8.3. Reviewers mention that Semaphore's support team is responsive and helpful, making it easier for small businesses to resolve issues quickly.
- Reviewers mention that Semaphore's Ease of Use is rated at 9.1, compared to Ansible's 8.7. Users on G2 appreciate Semaphore's intuitive interface, which simplifies the onboarding process for new users, while Ansible's complexity can be a hurdle for some.
- G2 users highlight Semaphore's strong performance in Deployment Automation with a score of 9.3, while Ansible's score is slightly lower at 9.1. Users say that Semaphore's deployment features are straightforward and efficient, allowing for quicker rollouts of applications.
- Users report that Semaphore shines in Test Customization with a score of 9.2, whereas Ansible's score is 8.3. Reviewers mention that Semaphore offers more flexible options for customizing tests, which is crucial for teams with specific testing needs.
- Reviewers mention that Semaphore's Configuration Management is rated at 9.0, while Ansible leads with a score of 9.0 as well, but users on G2 note that Ansible's features are more robust for larger enterprises, making it a better fit for complex environments.
- Users say that Semaphore's Automation capabilities are rated at 9.0, while Ansible's score is higher at 9.6. Reviewers mention that Ansible provides more advanced automation features, which are beneficial for organizations looking to scale their operations.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Basic Tower
$5,000
per year
Up to 100 nodes
- 30 Days of Support only
- No response time SLA
- Maintenance & Upgrades
Semaphore
Optimize Your CI/CD Pipeline with Personalized Onboarding
Contact Us
0 -
- Get onboarded on Semaphore by our CI/CD experts with 10yrs+ experience.
- Speed up your CI/CD pipeline by 20-30%.
- Reduce 50% in your CI/CD costs.
Free Trial
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Free Trial is available
Semaphore
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.0
154
9.1
164
Ease of Use
8.7
318
9.1
166
Ease of Setup
8.2
246
9.0
83
Ease of Admin
8.8
90
9.1
75
Quality of Support
8.3
126
9.6
150
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
74
9.6
71
Product Direction (% positive)
9.4
155
9.0
161
Features by Category
Administration
9.0
23
Not enough data
8.5
23
Not enough data
8.4
21
Not enough data
Functionality
9.3
24
Not enough data
8.6
20
Not enough data
8.3
21
Not enough data
8.6
24
Not enough data
8.2
19
Not enough data
Processes
8.6
22
Not enough data
8.7
22
Not enough data
8.3
20
Not enough data
Configuration
9.0
5
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Network Automation Tools
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Network
8.0
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Logistics
8.7
5
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
Security - Network Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
6.3
5
Not enough data
6.7
5
Not enough data
Administration
8.7
30
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.6
30
Not enough data
8.9
29
Not enough data
Automation
9.2
30
Not enough data
9.0
29
Not enough data
9.3
27
Not enough data
9.0
31
Not enough data
IT Management
9.0
32
Not enough data
9.1
31
Not enough data
8.5
28
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Network
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Application
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Vulnerability Scanner
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
9.1
16
9.3
38
8.9
17
9.2
38
8.9
16
8.7
37
Management
9.1
15
9.2
41
8.2
16
8.2
38
9.6
16
9.1
41
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Preparation
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Analysis
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Visualization
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Log Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
9.0
12
8.4
15
8.0
11
7.9
14
7.9
11
8.8
13
Functionality
8.9
11
9.2
15
8.2
10
8.8
14
8.7
10
8.8
14
Processes
8.3
11
9.1
15
7.5
10
8.9
15
8.3
11
8.8
13
Functionality
8.3
5
8.9
44
|
Verified
8.3
5
8.7
41
|
Verified
8.3
5
9.0
42
|
Verified
Management
8.3
5
9.4
44
|
Verified
8.0
5
9.4
44
|
Verified
8.7
5
8.2
39
|
Verified
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
9.3
33
Not enough data
9.2
34
Not enough data
8.7
31
Not enough data
9.0
31
Automation
Not enough data
8.7
32
Not enough data
9.0
32
Not enough data
9.1
32
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Automation Support - Runbook Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Error Management - Runbook Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Customization - Runbook Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Compliance and Reporting - Runbook Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance - Runbook Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Runbook Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
5.6
13
Not enough data
Platform
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.1
12
Not enough data
6.3
13
Not enough data
6.5
12
Not enough data
6.9
12
Not enough data
Security
6.0
12
Not enough data
8.3
13
Not enough data
6.8
12
Not enough data
8.6
12
Not enough data
8.3
12
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Enterprise IT Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform and Semaphore are categorized as DevOps Platforms, Continuous Delivery, and Continuous Integration
Unique Categories
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is categorized as Cloud Infrastructure Automation, Network Automation Tools, Application Release Orchestration, Patch Management, Vulnerability Scanner, Log Analysis, Enterprise IT Management, Configuration Management, Build Automation, and Runbook Automation
Semaphore is categorized as Automation Testing
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Semaphore
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
15.8%
Financial Services
10.7%
Computer Software
9.0%
Telecommunications
8.2%
Banking
6.3%
Other
50.0%
Computer Software
34.8%
Information Technology and Services
14.7%
Internet
8.2%
Financial Services
4.9%
Logistics and Supply Chain
2.2%
Other
35.3%
Discussions
What is Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform used for?
1 Comment
AJ
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform streamlines IT operations by automating configuration management, application deployment, and task automation. It excels...Read more
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has no more discussions with answers
Semaphore has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
