Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare QuestDB and Tinybird 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Kpow for Apache Kafka®
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
RaimaDB
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CockroachDB
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (66.7% of reviews)
Mid-Market (50.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial 1000 API Requests Per Month
QuestDB
Star Rating
(35)4.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (66.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about QuestDBTinybird
Star Rating
(14)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (50.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free Trial 1000 API Requests Per Month
Free Trial is available
Browse all 3 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that QuestDB excels in real-time analytics with a score of 9.3, while Tinybird, although capable, has a lower rating in this area, indicating that QuestDB may provide a more robust experience for users needing immediate data insights.
- Reviewers mention that QuestDB's data querying capabilities are rated at 9.7, showcasing its efficiency in handling complex queries, whereas Tinybird's performance in this aspect is not as strong, suggesting that users may find QuestDB more effective for intricate data retrieval tasks.
- G2 users highlight that QuestDB has a superior quality of support with a score of 9.8, compared to Tinybird's 8.6, indicating that users may receive more timely and helpful assistance when using QuestDB.
- Users on G2 report that QuestDB's ease of setup is rated at 9.2, making it more user-friendly for new adopters, while Tinybird lacks a score in this area, which could imply potential challenges for users during initial implementation.
- Reviewers mention that QuestDB shines in performance and reliability with a score of 9.7, suggesting that users can expect consistent uptime and fast processing speeds, while Tinybird's performance may not match this level of reliability.
- Users say that QuestDB's integration capabilities, particularly with APIs, are rated at 9.3, indicating a strong ability to connect with other systems, whereas Tinybird's integration features may not be as comprehensive, potentially limiting users' options for data connectivity.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
QuestDB
No pricing availableTinybird
Free
Free Trial
1000 API Requests Per Month
Free-forever, no time limit and no credit card required. For development and small projects.
- Up to 1000/req. per day. 10 GB max storage. Per Organization, per month
- No time limit, no credit card required
Free Trial
QuestDB
Free Trial is available
Tinybird
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.9
26
8.6
11
Ease of Use
9.0
27
7.7
11
Ease of Setup
9.2
19
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
9.0
12
Not enough data
Quality of Support
9.8
25
8.6
11
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.4
11
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
9.6
26
10.0
11
Features by Category
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Maintenance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Database Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Storage
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Availability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Query latency
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data latency
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Connectors
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Scale
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Architecture
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Database
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integrations
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Processing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Transformation
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
9.7
5
Connectivity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Operations
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Building Reports
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
QuestDB and Tinybird are categorized as Time Series Databases
Unique Categories
QuestDB has no unique categories
Tinybird is categorized as Columnar Databases, Big Data Processing and Distribution, Big Data Analytics, Database Management Systems (DBMS), Relational Databases, and Real-time Analytic Database
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
QuestDB
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Tinybird
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
24.2%
Financial Services
21.2%
Oil & Energy
6.1%
Information Technology and Services
6.1%
Manufacturing
3.0%
Other
39.4%
Computer Software
35.7%
Internet
14.3%
Telecommunications
7.1%
Retail
7.1%
Logistics and Supply Chain
7.1%
Other
28.6%
Alternatives
Discussions
QuestDB has no discussions with answers
Tinybird has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
