Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare QuestDB and Tiger Data 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
QuestDB
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Cloudways
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
ER/Studio
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (66.7% of reviews)
Small-Business (78.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial
QuestDB
Star Rating
(35)4.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (66.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about QuestDBTiger Data
Star Rating
(33)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (78.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free Trial
Learn more about Tiger DataSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Timescale excels in its Quality of Support, receiving a perfect score of 10.0, while QuestDB, although strong, has a slightly lower score of 9.8. Reviewers mention that Timescale's support team is highly responsive and knowledgeable, making it a preferred choice for businesses needing reliable assistance.
- Reviewers mention that Timescale's Ease of Setup is rated at 8.6, which is lower than QuestDB's score of 9.2. Users on G2 highlight that QuestDB's straightforward installation process and user-friendly interface make it easier for new users to get started quickly.
- G2 users indicate that Timescale shines in Performance Analysis, with a focus on time-series data, while QuestDB is noted for its Lower Query Latency. Users report that QuestDB's architecture allows for faster query responses, which is crucial for real-time analytics.
- Users say that Timescale's Data Replication features are robust, allowing for seamless data synchronization across multiple instances. In contrast, reviewers mention that QuestDB's replication capabilities are effective but may require more manual configuration, which can be a drawback for some users.
- Reviewers mention that Timescale offers a comprehensive Data Model that supports complex queries and time-series data, while QuestDB is praised for its Advanced Indexing capabilities, which enhance query performance. Users report that this makes QuestDB particularly appealing for applications requiring high-speed data retrieval.
- Users on G2 highlight that Timescale's Product Direction is rated at 10.0, indicating strong confidence in its future development, while QuestDB's score of 9.5 is still impressive but reflects slightly less certainty among users about its long-term roadmap. Reviewers say that Timescale's commitment to continuous improvement is a significant factor in their decision-making.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
QuestDB
No pricing availableTiger Data
Free
Free Trial
30 day free trial. No credit card required.
- Create a fully-managed Timescale instance in 30 seconds.
- Ingest data at petabyte-scale with rock-solid reliability
- Analyze data using advanced time-series capabilities
Free Trial
QuestDB
Free Trial is available
Tiger Data
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.9
26
9.3
27
Ease of Use
9.0
27
9.0
27
Ease of Setup
9.2
19
8.5
17
Ease of Admin
9.0
12
8.7
10
Quality of Support
9.8
25
9.5
24
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.4
11
9.3
10
Product Direction (% positive)
9.6
26
9.1
27
Features by Category
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.3
5
Maintenance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.3
5
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.7
5
Management
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
8.9
9
Not enough data
8.6
7
Not enough data
8.6
6
Support
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
8.6
6
Security
Not enough data
9.3
7
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
9.0
7
Performance
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
8.6
7
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
9.2
8
Not enough data
8.8
8
Database Features
Not enough data
9.6
8
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
9.3
10
Not enough data
9.1
9
Not enough data
8.9
9
Not enough data
9.1
9
Not enough data
9.4
9
Storage
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Availability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Indexing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Filters
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Query latency
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data latency
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Connectors
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Scale
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Architecture
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Development
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Database
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
8.6
7
Infrastructure
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
8.1
6
Configuration
Not enough data
8.6
15
Not enough data
8.5
9
Not enough data
8.8
15
Not enough data
8.3
9
Not enough data
7.9
13
Database Administration
Not enough data
8.3
11
Not enough data
7.6
9
Not enough data
8.3
11
Availability
Not enough data
8.9
11
Not enough data
8.9
11
Not enough data
8.5
8
Not enough data
9.2
12
Security
Not enough data
8.8
8
Not enough data
7.1
11
Not enough data
8.6
7
Data Management
Not enough data
8.3
7
Not enough data
8.3
9
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
QuestDB and Tiger Data are categorized as Time Series Databases
Unique Categories
QuestDB has no unique categories
Tiger Data is categorized as Real-time Analytic Database, Columnar Databases, Database as a Service (DBaaS), Database Management Systems (DBMS), Relational Databases, Cloud Platform as a Service (PaaS), and Vector Database
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
QuestDB
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Tiger Data
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
24.2%
Financial Services
21.2%
Oil & Energy
6.1%
Information Technology and Services
6.1%
Manufacturing
3.0%
Other
39.4%
Computer Software
24.2%
Financial Services
21.2%
Information Technology and Services
12.1%
Consulting
6.1%
Renewables & Environment
6.1%
Other
30.3%
Alternatives
Discussions
QuestDB has no discussions with answers
Tiger Data has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
