When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Qualys WAS easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with Qualys WAS overall.
Reviewers felt that Qualys WAS meets the needs of their business better than Tenable Security Center.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Qualys WAS is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Qualys WAS over Tenable Security Center.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Qualys WAS
No pricing available
Tenable Security Center
No pricing available
Free Trial
Qualys WAS
No trial information available
Tenable Security Center
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.6
14
9.2
44
Ease of Use
9.3
14
8.6
48
Ease of Setup
10.0
5
8.6
42
Ease of Admin
10.0
5
8.6
43
Quality of Support
9.3
14
8.5
47
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
What are the typical features offered by vulnerability scanner?
1 Comment
HQ
Vulnerability scanners are essential tools for identifying and mitigating security risks in computer systems and networks. They offer a range of features to...Read more
What is the best way to break up scans so they don't use licenses up and so scans don't end up getting blocked?
1 Comment
CP
I would recommend to break in to groups based on your organization and run host discovery first and run asset based scanning to avoid this situation....Read more
What is Tenable.sc used for?
1 Comment
SW
Tenable products look for vulnerabilities in systems and devices. This way you can fix those before the bad gues get in. Think of it this way. Remember...Read more
Tenable Security Center has no more discussions with answers
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.