Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare Qualys WAS and Tenable Nessus

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
Qualys WAS
Qualys WAS
Star Rating
(20)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (47.4% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Qualys WAS
Tenable Nessus
Tenable Nessus
Star Rating
(298)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (39.5% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$3,390.00 1 License With One-Time Purchase
Free Trial is available
Browse all 4 pricing plans
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that Qualys WAS excels in ease of setup, achieving a perfect score of 10.0, while Tenable Nessus falls behind with a score of 8.7. Reviewers mention that the streamlined onboarding process of Qualys WAS significantly reduces the time to deployment.
  • Reviewers mention that Qualys WAS has a superior detection rate of 9.1 compared to Tenable Nessus's 8.8. Users on G2 highlight that Qualys WAS's advanced scanning capabilities allow for more accurate vulnerability identification, which is crucial for maintaining security.
  • Users say that Qualys WAS has a lower false positive rate, scoring 6.2, compared to Tenable Nessus's 6.7. Reviewers mention that this difference can lead to more efficient remediation efforts, as teams spend less time investigating false alarms with Qualys WAS.
  • G2 users report that Qualys WAS shines in automated scans, scoring 9.6, while Tenable Nessus scores 9.0. Users highlight that the automation features in Qualys allow for more frequent and thorough assessments without manual intervention.
  • Reviewers mention that Tenable Nessus offers better manual application testing capabilities, scoring 8.3 compared to Qualys WAS's 7.1. Users say that this feature is particularly beneficial for organizations that require in-depth analysis of their applications.
  • Users on G2 report that Qualys WAS has a higher overall satisfaction rating with a score of 9.6 for meeting requirements, while Tenable Nessus scores 9.0. Reviewers mention that this reflects Qualys's ability to align closely with user needs and expectations.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Qualys WAS
No pricing available
Tenable Nessus
Pro - 1 Year
$3,390.00
1 License With One-Time Purchase
Browse all 4 pricing plans
Free Trial
Qualys WAS
No trial information available
Tenable Nessus
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.6
14
9.0
246
Ease of Use
9.3
14
8.9
248
Ease of Setup
10.0
5
8.8
170
Ease of Admin
10.0
5
8.9
160
Quality of Support
9.3
14
8.4
228
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.7
5
8.7
148
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
12
9.0
237
Features by Category
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)Hide 13 FeaturesShow 13 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.2
14
8.2
154
Performance
8.5
13
Feature Not Available
9.1
13
8.9
140
|
Verified
6.2
13
6.7
137
|
Verified
9.6
13
9.1
134
|
Verified
Network
8.9
12
8.8
136
|
Verified
8.3
12
8.8
128
|
Verified
8.2
12
8.4
112
|
Verified
Application
7.1
11
Feature Not Available
7.0
11
7.3
85
8.7
13
7.8
104
Agentic AI - Vulnerability Scanner
Not enough data
8.0
10
Not enough data
8.0
10
Not enough data
Not enough data
API Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Attack Surface ManagementHide 12 FeaturesShow 12 Features
Not enough data
8.3
6
Asset Management
Not enough data
6.9
6
Not enough data
7.5
6
Not enough data
4.7
6
Monitoring
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
10.0
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
9.2
6
Risk Management
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
9.4
6
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Qualys WAS
Qualys WAS
Tenable Nessus
Tenable Nessus
Qualys WAS and Tenable Nessus are categorized as Vulnerability Scanner
Unique Categories
Qualys WAS
Qualys WAS has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Qualys WAS
Qualys WAS
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
21.1%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
47.4%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
31.6%
Tenable Nessus
Tenable Nessus
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
26.3%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
39.5%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
34.2%
Reviewers' Industry
Qualys WAS
Qualys WAS
Information Technology and Services
31.6%
Computer Software
31.6%
Computer & Network Security
21.1%
Outsourcing/Offshoring
5.3%
Internet
5.3%
Other
5.3%
Tenable Nessus
Tenable Nessus
Information Technology and Services
25.9%
Computer & Network Security
17.0%
Financial Services
7.8%
Computer Software
6.4%
Banking
4.6%
Other
38.3%
Alternatives
Qualys WAS
Qualys WAS Alternatives
Burp Suite
Burp Suite
Add Burp Suite
Wiz
Wiz
Add Wiz
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Add Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Invicti (formerly Netsparker)
Invicti (formerly Netsparker)
Add Invicti (formerly Netsparker)
Tenable Nessus
Tenable Nessus Alternatives
Intruder
Intruder
Add Intruder
Invicti (formerly Netsparker)
Invicti (formerly Netsparker)
Add Invicti (formerly Netsparker)
Detectify
Detectify
Add Detectify
Wiz
Wiz
Add Wiz
Discussions
Qualys WAS
Qualys WAS Discussions
What are the typical features offered by vulnerability scanner?
1 Comment
Hamza Abdul Jabbar Q.
HQ
Vulnerability scanners are essential tools for identifying and mitigating security risks in computer systems and networks. They offer a range of features to...Read more
Monty the Mongoose crying
Qualys WAS has no more discussions with answers
Tenable Nessus
Tenable Nessus Discussions
I'm a consultant; can I use Nessus Professional to conduct my client's vulnerability scanning?
2 Comments
ANKIT S.
AS
Yes, you can.Read more
Is Nessus professional the right product for me?
2 Comments
Official Response from Tenable Nessus
Nessus Professional has always been designed for the security professional. The typical Nessus user is a consultant or contractor who is very experienced...Read more
Can I use Nessus professional data in other applications?
2 Comments
Official Response from Tenable Nessus
Yes. Many third party applications can incorporate a Nessus file. This allows consultants to share the data with their clients’ other applications for the...Read more