Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Qt and Windows App SDK 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Opti Digital
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
1oT
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
DocSheets
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (48.1% of reviews)
Small-Business (39.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Qt
Star Rating
(53)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (48.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about QtWindows App SDK
Star Rating
(47)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (39.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Windows App SDKSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Qt excels in multi-language support, with a score of 8.3, while Windows App SDK slightly outperforms it with a score of 8.5, indicating that users appreciate the broader language options available in Windows App SDK.
- Reviewers mention that Qt's file management features are rated at 7.7, which some users find limiting compared to Windows App SDK's higher score of 8.3, suggesting that Windows App SDK offers a more robust file handling experience.
- G2 users highlight that Qt provides good customization options with a score of 8.0, but Windows App SDK shines brighter with an 8.5, indicating that users find it easier to tailor their applications to specific needs using Windows App SDK.
- Users on G2 say that both products have similar straight-out-the-box functionality, with Qt scoring 8.7 and Windows App SDK at 8.6, suggesting that both are user-friendly for initial setups, but Qt has a slight edge.
- Reviewers mention that the patching and updates process in Windows App SDK is rated higher at 8.1 compared to Qt's 7.7, indicating that users find Windows App SDK more reliable in maintaining up-to-date software.
- Users report that the help guides provided by Qt are rated at 8.3, which is slightly better than Windows App SDK's 8.1, suggesting that Qt may offer more comprehensive resources for users seeking assistance.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Qt
No pricing availableWindows App SDK
No pricing availableFree Trial
Qt
Free Trial is available
Windows App SDK
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.5
45
8.7
45
Ease of Use
8.4
45
8.1
45
Ease of Setup
8.5
13
8.3
19
Ease of Admin
8.3
11
8.1
19
Quality of Support
8.3
30
7.9
41
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.8
10
7.6
17
Product Direction (% positive)
8.2
45
8.4
43
Features by Category
Python Integrated Development Environments (IDE)Hide 7 FeaturesShow 7 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
C/C++ Integrated Development Environments (IDE)Hide 7 FeaturesShow 7 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Application Design
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Application Control
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
9.2
6
9.2
8
8.1
6
8.3
8
8.6
6
8.5
8
8.3
6
8.5
8
8.9
6
8.6
7
8.6
6
8.1
8
8.1
6
8.1
8
Platform - App Monetization Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Advertising - App Monetization Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Organization - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Mobile Development Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Qt and Windows App SDK are categorized as Application Development Platforms and Mobile Development Platforms
Unique Categories
Windows App SDK has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Qt
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Windows App SDK
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
28.8%
Information Technology and Services
7.7%
Telecommunications
5.8%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
5.8%
Higher Education
5.8%
Other
46.2%
Computer Software
26.1%
Information Technology and Services
13.0%
Higher Education
6.5%
Security and Investigations
4.3%
Hospital & Health Care
4.3%
Other
45.7%
Alternatives
Discussions
What are the primary benefits of QtCreator?
1 Comment
LR
QtCreator has many benefits:
+ It is stable mature software being continuously developed and maintained following best practices since 1995.
+ It has...Read more
What is the use of Qt Creator?
1 Comment
SP
It’s a multi-platform Développement IDE available for windows, Linux, macOS, android and others.Read more
Is Qt Creator IDE free?
1 Comment
SP
QT Creator is the development IDE, you can use the IDE however the QT libraries are only free for open source development which means if you use the open...Read more
Windows App SDK has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
